Skip to content

std::net::tcp docs: Use current syntax and types #5185

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ben0x539
Copy link
Contributor

@ben0x539 ben0x539 commented Mar 1, 2013

This changes various type_names to TypeNames and fixes the example for tcp::accept that was still using the old match syntax and {|args| ...} closures.

The accept example was fairly outdated. I was just going to stay away from all the IO things until the scheduler revamp lands, but accept is probably one of the obvious starting points for networking stuff for a learner, and I don't want to get in the way of anyone's enthusiasm.

Doesn't touch non-comment lines, so I hope I will get away without learning about unit tests. It doesn't seem like the test system is set up to extract tests from doc comments right now.

Doesn't touch non-comment lines. This changes various type_names to TypeNames
and fixes the example for `tcp::accept` that was still using the old
`match` syntax and `{|args| ...}` closures.
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Mar 1, 2013

Thanks!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2013
This changes various type_names to TypeNames and fixes the example for `tcp::accept` that was still using the old `match` syntax and `{|args| ...}` closures.

The `accept` example was fairly outdated. I was just going to stay away from all the IO things until the scheduler revamp lands, but `accept` is probably one of the obvious starting points for networking stuff for a learner, and I don't want to get in the way of anyone's enthusiasm.

Doesn't touch non-comment lines, so I hope I will get away without learning about unit tests. It doesn't seem like the test system is set up to extract tests from doc comments right now.
@bors bors closed this Mar 2, 2013
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2020
…oat-literal, r=flip1995

Lint lossy whole number float literals

changelog: Extend `excessive_precision` to lint lossy whole number float literals

Fixes rust-lang#5160
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 2, 2020
…shearth,llogiq,flip1995

I like to move it, move it

GHA now runs in the background for 6 days (rust-lang#5088)

Since then ~~15~~ 19 PRs were successfully merged and Travis+Appveyor agreed on the status in every case. ([GitHub PR search query](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+merged%3A%3E%3D2020-02-12T15%3A42%3A00+sort%3Aupdated-desc+NOT+%5Bgh-pages%5D+in%3Atitle))

Some PRs were:
- rust-lang#5163
- rust-lang#5170
- rust-lang#5168
- rust-lang#5173
- rust-lang#5171
- rust-lang#5156
- rust-lang#4809
- rust-lang#5177
- rust-lang#5182
- rust-lang#5183
- rust-lang#5184
- rust-lang#5185
- rust-lang#5186
- rust-lang#5181
- rust-lang#5189

Bug with GHA:
- When a rustc PR gets merged between the `integration_build` and the `integration` job, the `integration` job will fail. This happened once in rust-lang#5162, but not in the past 6 days. Even if it would happen every 4th PR we would save time, since splitting up the integration build and tests saves 5-7 minutes per run and a complete run takes 15-17 minutes
- Sometimes the MacOS build takes up to an hour to download the master toolchain. Until now, this happend 2 or 3 times and can be resolved by a `@bors r3try`+canceling the previous run (restarting single jobs is not supported yet)

## Before merging this, rust-lang/rust-central-station#578 has to get merged

This PR is for starting the discussion and to get consensus (@rust-lang/clippy) on a final move to GHA. If we're ready, I'll contact Pietro, to finalize the move.

changelog: Clippy completely runs on GHA now 🎉

---

BTW: The deployment already runs on GHA, instead of Travis.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants