Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make codegen_fn_attrs query cheap to clone #53499

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This is an attempt to recover a perf loss observed in #52993 by making the
result of the codegen_fn_attrs query cheap to clone as more and more parts of
the compiler start to use this query.

This is an attempt to recover a perf loss observed in rust-lang#52993 by making the
result of the `codegen_fn_attrs` query cheap to clone as more and more parts of
the compiler start to use this query.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: try

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 19, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 19, 2018

⌛ Trying commit d8db15c with merge c250010...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2018
Make `codegen_fn_attrs` query cheap to clone

This is an attempt to recover a perf loss observed in #52993 by making the
result of the `codegen_fn_attrs` query cheap to clone as more and more parts of
the compiler start to use this query.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 19, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
State: approved= try=True

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@rust-timer build c250010

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Success: Queued c250010 with parent b355906, comparison URL.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

The regression I'm trying to fix was definitely not fixed in this perf run, so will need to keep looking!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants