Skip to content

[WIP] Fix evaluation overflow #53687

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[WIP] Fix evaluation overflow #53687

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/librustc/traits/structural_impls.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Lift<'tcx> for traits::SelectionError<'a> {
super::ConstEvalFailure(ref err) => tcx.lift(&**err).map(|err| super::ConstEvalFailure(
err.into(),
)),
super::Overflow => bug!(), // FIXME: ape ConstEvalFailure?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I'm .. not entirely sure why this was bug! to begin with. It seems like it could just be Some(super::Overflow), instead?

super::Overflow => Some(super::Overflow),
}
}
}
Expand Down