Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs #55296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2018

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Oct 23, 2018

This UI test is sensitive to backtrace output, so it should make sure
that backtraces are not enabled by the environment.

This UI test is sensitive to backtrace output, so it should make sure
that backtraces are not enabled by the environment.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 23, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2018

📌 Commit f2443a9 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
…omatsakis

Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs

This UI test is sensitive to backtrace output, so it should make sure
that backtraces are not enabled by the environment.
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
…omatsakis

Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs

This UI test is sensitive to backtrace output, so it should make sure
that backtraces are not enabled by the environment.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
Rollup of 22 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #53507 (Add doc for impl From for Waker)
 - #53931 (Gradually expanding libstd's keyword documentation)
 - #54965 (update tcp stream documentation)
 - #54977 (Accept `Option<Box<$t:ty>>` in macro argument)
 - #55138 (in which unused-parens suggestions heed what the user actually wrote)
 - #55173 (Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type)
 - #55200 (Documents `From` implementations for `Stdio`)
 - #55245 (submodules: update clippy from 5afdf8b to b1d0343)
 - #55247 (Clarified code example in char primitive doc)
 - #55251 (Fix a typo in the documentation of RangeInclusive)
 - #55253 (only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums)
 - #55254 (Correct trailing ellipsis in name_from_pat)
 - #55269 (fix typos in various places)
 - #55282 (Remove redundant clone)
 - #55285 (Do some copy editing on the release notes)
 - #55291 (Update stdsimd submodule)
 - #55296 (Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs)
 - #55306 (Regression test for #54478.)
 - #55328 (Fix doc for new copysign functions)
 - #55340 (Operands no longer appear in places)
 - #55345 (Remove is_null)
 - #55348 (Update RELEASES.md after destabilization of non_modrs_mods)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 25, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #55347) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 25, 2018
@bors bors merged commit f2443a9 into rust-lang:master Oct 25, 2018
@cuviper cuviper deleted the rustdoc-ui-backtrace branch March 27, 2019 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants