Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NLL: Update box insensitivity test #55801

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2018

Conversation

pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@pnkfelix pnkfelix commented Nov 8, 2018

This is just keeping one of our tests honest with respect to NLL, in two ways:

  1. Adds uses of borrows that would otherwise be too short to observe the error that we would have expected to see...
  2. ... I say "would have expected" because all of the errors in this file are part of the reversion of RFC to remove some special treatment of Box by borrow checker rfcs#130 that is attached to NLL (you can see more discussion of this here non-lexical lifetimes (NLL) tracking issue #43234 (comment) )

(The commit prior to this actual passes our test suite, "thanks"
to rust-lang#55695. But since I am aware of that bug, I took advantage of it
in choosing how to order my commit series...)
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 8, 2018
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

pnkfelix commented Nov 8, 2018

r? @davidtwco

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned davidtwco and unassigned aturon Nov 8, 2018
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2018

📌 Commit 9b6a568 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 9, 2018
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2018
…est-for-nll, r=davidtwco

NLL: Update box insensitivity test

This is just keeping one of our tests honest with respect to NLL, in two ways:

 1. Adds uses of borrows that would otherwise be too short to observe the error that we would have expected to see...
 2. ... I say "would have expected" because all of the errors in this file are part of the reversion of rust-lang/rfcs#130 that is attached to NLL (you can see more discussion of this here rust-lang#43234 (comment) )
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2018
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #55630 (resolve: Filter away macro prelude in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]` on 2018 edition)
 - #55687 (Take supertraits into account when calculating associated types)
 - #55745 (Convert `outlives_components`' return value to a `SmallVec` outparam.)
 - #55764 (Fix Rc/Arc allocation layout)
 - #55792 (Prevent ICE in const-prop array oob check)
 - #55799 (Removed unneeded instance of `// revisions` from a lint test)
 - #55800 (Fix ICE in `return_type_impl_trait`)
 - #55801 (NLL: Update box insensitivity test)
 - #55802 (Don't inline virtual calls (take 2))
 - #55816 (Use `SmallVec` to avoid allocations in `from_decimal_string`.)
 - #55819 (Typecheck patterns of all match arms first, so we get types for bindings)
 - #55822 (ICE with #![feature(nll)] and elided lifetimes)
 - #55828 (Add missing `rustc_promotable` attribute to unsigned `min_value` and `max_value`)
 - #55839 (Fix docstring spelling mistakes)
 - #55844 (Fix documentation typos.)
 - #55845 (Set BINARYEN_TRAP_MODE=clamp)
 - #55856 (rustdoc: refactor: move all static-file include!s into a single module)
@bors bors merged commit 9b6a568 into rust-lang:master Nov 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants