-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NLL: Update box insensitivity test #55801
Merged
bors
merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
pnkfelix:update-box-insensitivity-test-for-nll
Nov 11, 2018
Merged
NLL: Update box insensitivity test #55801
bors
merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
pnkfelix:update-box-insensitivity-test-for-nll
Nov 11, 2018
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…hing approximating lexical scope.
(The commit prior to this actual passes our test suite, "thanks" to rust-lang#55695. But since I am aware of that bug, I took advantage of it in choosing how to order my commit series...)
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Nov 8, 2018
r? @davidtwco |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 9b6a568 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 9, 2018
pietroalbini
added a commit
to pietroalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2018
…est-for-nll, r=davidtwco NLL: Update box insensitivity test This is just keeping one of our tests honest with respect to NLL, in two ways: 1. Adds uses of borrows that would otherwise be too short to observe the error that we would have expected to see... 2. ... I say "would have expected" because all of the errors in this file are part of the reversion of rust-lang/rfcs#130 that is attached to NLL (you can see more discussion of this here rust-lang#43234 (comment) )
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2018
Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - #55630 (resolve: Filter away macro prelude in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]` on 2018 edition) - #55687 (Take supertraits into account when calculating associated types) - #55745 (Convert `outlives_components`' return value to a `SmallVec` outparam.) - #55764 (Fix Rc/Arc allocation layout) - #55792 (Prevent ICE in const-prop array oob check) - #55799 (Removed unneeded instance of `// revisions` from a lint test) - #55800 (Fix ICE in `return_type_impl_trait`) - #55801 (NLL: Update box insensitivity test) - #55802 (Don't inline virtual calls (take 2)) - #55816 (Use `SmallVec` to avoid allocations in `from_decimal_string`.) - #55819 (Typecheck patterns of all match arms first, so we get types for bindings) - #55822 (ICE with #![feature(nll)] and elided lifetimes) - #55828 (Add missing `rustc_promotable` attribute to unsigned `min_value` and `max_value`) - #55839 (Fix docstring spelling mistakes) - #55844 (Fix documentation typos.) - #55845 (Set BINARYEN_TRAP_MODE=clamp) - #55856 (rustdoc: refactor: move all static-file include!s into a single module)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just keeping one of our tests honest with respect to NLL, in two ways: