-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note. #57099
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Dec 24, 2018
This commit extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the environment has already been invoked when being invoked again. Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note.
davidtwco
force-pushed
the
issue-57098
branch
from
December 26, 2018 20:55
a815e46
to
fcad209
Compare
nikomatsakis
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2019
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit fcad209 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 2, 2019
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2019
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note. Fixes rust-lang#57098. This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the environment has already been invoked when being invoked again. Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note. r? @pnkfelix
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2019
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note. Fixes #57098. This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the environment has already been invoked when being invoked again. Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note. r? @pnkfelix
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #57098.
This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that
is
FnOnce
and therefore moves variables that it captures from theenvironment has already been invoked when being invoked again.
Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after
previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note.
r? @pnkfelix