- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
privacy: Account for associated existential types #57649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | I hate this kind of patchwork! I suppose that's what happens when I have no idea on how existential types work. | 
              
                    arielb1
  
              
              reviewed
              
                  
                    Jan 17, 2019 
                  
              
              
            
            
              
                    arielb1
  
              
              reviewed
              
                  
                    Jan 17, 2019 
                  
              
              
            
            
| r=me with using exhaustive matches, which should catch any sillinesss that might happen if someone refactors these enums. | 
004af87    to
    ee86eae      
    Compare
  
    ee86eae    to
    d34b3e9      
    Compare
  
    | Exhaustive matches are added and factored into a separate function. @bors r=arielb1 | 
| 📌 Commit d34b3e9 has been approved by  | 
    
  Centril 
      added a commit
        to Centril/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 18, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
privacy: Account for associated existential types Turns out they *can* be associated (but only in impls, not traits). Fixes rust-lang#53546 (comment) r? @arielb1
    
  Centril 
      added a commit
        to Centril/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 19, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
privacy: Account for associated existential types Turns out they *can* be associated (but only in impls, not traits). Fixes rust-lang#53546 (comment) r? @arielb1
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 19, 2019 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #57486 (Simplify `TokenStream` some more) - #57502 (make trait-aliases work across crates) - #57598 (Add missing unpretty option help message) - #57649 (privacy: Account for associated existential types) - #57659 (Fix release manifest generation) - #57699 (add applicability to remaining suggestions) - #57719 (Tweak `expand_node`) Failed merges: r? @ghost
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Turns out they can be associated (but only in impls, not traits).
Fixes #53546 (comment)
r? @arielb1