Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow #[repr(align(x))] on enums (#57996) #57998

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 7, 2019
Merged

Conversation

niklasf
Copy link
Contributor

@niklasf niklasf commented Jan 30, 2019

Tracking issue: #57996

Implements an extension of RFC 1358 behind a feature flag (repr_align_enum). Originally introduced here for structs: #39999.

It seems like only HIR-level changes are required, since enums are already aware of their alignment (due to alignment of their limbs).

cc @bitshifter

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 30, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jan 31, 2019

r? @nagisa cc @eddyb @alexcrichton

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nagisa and unassigned steveklabnik Jan 31, 2019
@Centril Centril added I-nominated T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 31, 2019
@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Jan 31, 2019

We discussed this PR briefly in the Lang Team meeting today. Folks generally feel comfortable with this addition (especially since it's unstable). The one question was: is this equivalent to wrapping in a struct with an alignment? Modulo clarifying that part of the spec, we are 👍

@niklasf
Copy link
Contributor Author

niklasf commented Jan 31, 2019

Awesome.

is this equivalent to wrapping in a struct with an alignment?

Yes, that is the intent. I added this to the docs.

@Centril Centril removed the T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 31, 2019
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 1, 2019

This needs a codegen test IMO. Otherwise looks good.

@niklasf
Copy link
Contributor Author

niklasf commented Feb 1, 2019

Makes sense. Added a very basic codegen test (a6fd6ec).

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 5, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

📌 Commit a6fd6ec has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 5, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 6, 2019

⌛ Testing commit a6fd6ec with merge ff672da096df7ab05d7e7374eeadb299e6a6347e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 6, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 6, 2019
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Feb 6, 2019

@bors retry #58025

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 6, 2019
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 6, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 6, 2019

⌛ Testing commit a6fd6ec with merge 631a162...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
Allow #[repr(align(x))] on enums (#57996)

Tracking issue: #57996

Implements an extension of [RFC 1358](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1358-repr-align.md) behind a feature flag (`repr_align_enum`). Originally introduced here for structs: #39999.

It seems like only HIR-level changes are required, since enums are already aware of their alignment (due to alignment of their limbs).

cc @bitshifter
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 6, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 6, 2019
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Feb 6, 2019

@bors retry #58160

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 6, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2019

⌛ Testing commit a6fd6ec with merge 825f355...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2019
Allow #[repr(align(x))] on enums (#57996)

Tracking issue: #57996

Implements an extension of [RFC 1358](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1358-repr-align.md) behind a feature flag (`repr_align_enum`). Originally introduced here for structs: #39999.

It seems like only HIR-level changes are required, since enums are already aware of their alignment (due to alignment of their limbs).

cc @bitshifter
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 7, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 825f355 to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants