-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 15 pull requests #58666
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 15 pull requests #58666
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Specialize Iterator::try_fold and DoubleEndedIterator::try_rfold to improve code generation in all internal iteration scenarios. This changes brings the performance of internal iteration with RangeInclusive on par with the performance of iteration with Range: - Single conditional jump in hot loop, - Unrolling and vectorization, - And even Closed Form substitution. Unfortunately, it only applies to internal iteration. Despite various attempts at stream-lining the implementation of next and next_back, LLVM has stubbornly refused to optimize external iteration appropriately, leaving me with a choice between: - The current implementation, for which Closed Form substitution is performed, but which uses 2 conditional jumps in the hot loop when optimization fail. - An implementation using a "is_done" boolean, which uses 1 conditional jump in the hot loop when optimization fail, allowing unrolling and vectorization, but for which Closed Form substitution fails. In the absence of any conclusive evidence as to which usecase matters most, and with no assurance that the lack of Closed Form substitution is not indicative of other optimizations being foiled, there is no way to pick one implementation over the other, and thus I defer to the statu quo as far as next and next_back are concerned.
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Aaronepower <Aaronepower@users.noreply.github.com>
… the move was partial
if security_qos_flags(SECURITY_ANONYMOUS) is set
It is currently a method of `Token`, but it only is valid to call if `self` is a `Token::Interpolated`. This commit eliminates the possibility of misuse by changing it to an associated function that takes a `Nonterminal`, which also simplifies the call sites. This requires splitting out a new function, `nonterminal_to_string`.
It's present within `Token::Interpolated` as an optimization, so that if a nonterminal is converted to a `TokenStream` multiple times, the first-computed value is saved and reused. But in practice it's not needed. `interpolated_to_tokenstream()` is a cold function: it's only called a few dozen times while compiling rustc itself, and a few hundred times across the entire `rustc-perf` suite. Furthermore, when it is called, it is almost always the first conversion, so no benefit is gained from it. So this commit removes `LazyTokenStream`, along with the now-unnecessary `Token::interpolated()`. As well as a significant simplification, the removal speeds things up slightly, mostly due to not having to `drop` the `LazyTokenStream` instances.
The current code (expensively) clones the value within an `Rc`. This commit changes things so that the `Rc` itself is (cheaply) cloned instead, avoid some allocations. This requires converting a few `Rc` instances to `Lrc`.
These are probably leftovers from recent `TokenStream` simplifications.
AFAICT, we do not have the same const-eval issues that we used to when rust-lang#23926 was filed. (Probably because of the switch to miri for const-evaluation.)
RangeInclusive internal iteration performance improvement. Specialize `Iterator::try_fold` and `DoubleEndedIterator::try_rfold` to improve code generation in all internal iteration scenarios. This changes brings the performance of internal iteration with `RangeInclusive` on par with the performance of iteration with `Range`: - Single conditional jump in hot loop, - Unrolling and vectorization, - And even Closed Form substitution. Unfortunately, it only applies to internal iteration. Despite various attempts at stream-lining the implementation of `next` and `next_back`, LLVM has stubbornly refused to optimize external iteration appropriately, leaving me with a choice between: - The current implementation, for which Closed Form substitution is performed, but which uses 2 conditional jumps in the hot loop when optimization fail. - An implementation using a `is_done` boolean, which uses 1 conditional jump in the hot loop when optimization fail, allowing unrolling and vectorization, but for which Closed Form substitution fails. In the absence of any conclusive evidence as to which usecase matters most, and with no assurance that the lack of Closed Form substitution is not indicative of other optimizations being foiled, there is no way to pick one implementation over the other, and thus I defer to the statu quo as far as `next` and `next_back` are concerned.
…stebank Add better error message for partial move closes rust-lang#56657 r? @davidtwco
Set secure flags when opening a named pipe on Windows Fixes rust-lang#42036, see also the previous attempt in rust-lang#44556. Whether this is correct depends on if it is somehow possible to create a symlink to a named pipe, outside the named pipe filesystem (NPFS). But as far as I can tell that should be impossible. Also fixes that `security_qos_flags(SECURITY_ANONYMOUS)` does not set the `SECURITY_SQOS_PRESENT` flag, and the incorrect documentation about the default value of `security_qos_flags`.
Updated RELEASES.md for 1.33.0 [Rendered](https://github.com/Aaronepower/rust/blob/master/RELEASES.md) r? @Mark-Simulacrum cc @rust-lang/release
…nts, r=arielb1 Check the Self-type of inherent associated constants r? @arielb1
SGX target: fix panic = abort What is the difference between `no_mangle` and `rustc_std_internal_symbol`?
…etrochenkov Remove `LazyTokenStream`. `LazyTokenStream` was added in rust-lang#40939. Perhaps it was an effective optimization then, but no longer. This PR removes it, making the code both simpler and faster. r? @alexcrichton
Special suggestion for illegal unicode curly quote pairs Fixes rust-lang#58436 Did not end up expanding the error message span to include the full string literal since I figured the start of the token was the issue, while the help suggestion span would include up to the closing quotation mark. The look ahead logic does not affect the reader position, not sure if that is an issue (if eg it should still continue to parse after the closing quote without erroring out).
…iated, r=oli-obk Turn duration consts into associated consts As suggested in rust-lang#57391 (comment), I'm moving `Duration` constants (`SECOND`, `MILLISECOND` and so on; currently behind unstable `duration_constants` feature) into the `impl Duration` block. cc @frewsxcv @SimonSapin
Allow Self::Module to be mutated. This only changes `&Self::Module` to `&mut Self::Module` in a couple of places. `codegen_allocator` and `write_metadata` from `ExtraBackendMethods` mutate the underlying LLVM module. As such, it makes sense for these two functions to receive a mutable reference to the module (as opposed to an immutable one). I am trying to implement `codegen_allocator` for my backend, and I need to be able to mutate `Self::Module`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/f66e4697ae286985ddefc53c3a047614568458bb/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/traits/backend.rs#L41 Modifying the module in `codegen_allocator`/`write_metadata` is not a problem for the LLVM backend, because [ModuleLlvm](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/lib.rs#L357) contains a raw pointer to the underlying LLVM module, so it can easily be mutated through FFI calls. I am trying to avoid interior mutability and `unsafe` as much as I can. What do you think? Does this change make sense, or is there a reason why this should stay the way it is?
…-obk Optimise vec![false; N] to zero-alloc Nowadays booleans have a well-defined representation, so there is no reason not to optimise their allocation.
… r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: support methods on primitives in intra-doc links Fixes rust-lang#58598.
…anishearth Don't generate minification variables if minification disabled If the minification is disabled, there is no sense having those variables. r? @QuietMisdreavus
…r=nikomatsakis Update tests to account for cross-platform testing and miri. Fix rust-lang#23926
Do not underflow after resetting unmatched braces count Fix rust-lang#58638. r? @oli-obk
@bors r+ p=15 |
📌 Commit 28faa88 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Feb 23, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 28faa88 with merge b7c23cef78827ea512d1e8c8918b187b32463fb1... |
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Feb 23, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
LazyTokenStream
. #58476 (RemoveLazyTokenStream
.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost