Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove some unnecessary 'extern crate' #58704

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2019
Merged

Conversation

taiki-e
Copy link
Member

@taiki-e taiki-e commented Feb 24, 2019

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 24, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 25, 2019

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 25, 2019

📌 Commit 9a0b4b6 has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 25, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #58370 (Relax some Hash bounds on HashMap<K, V, S> and HashSet<T, S>)
 - #58421 (Relax some Ord bounds on BinaryHeap<T>)
 - #58686 (replace deprecated rustfmt_skip with rustfmt::skip)
 - #58697 (Use ? in some macros)
 - #58704 (Remove some unnecessary 'extern crate')

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 9a0b4b6 into rust-lang:master Feb 25, 2019
@taiki-e taiki-e deleted the extern-crate branch February 25, 2019 08:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants