-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggest using anonymous lifetime in impl Trait
return
#58919
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,10 +1,20 @@ | ||
error[E0621]: explicit lifetime required in the type of `x` | ||
--> $DIR/must_outlive_least_region_or_bound.rs:3:23 | ||
error: cannot infer an appropriate lifetime | ||
--> $DIR/must_outlive_least_region_or_bound.rs:3:35 | ||
| | ||
LL | fn elided(x: &i32) -> impl Copy { x } | ||
| ---- ^^^^^^^^^ lifetime `'static` required | ||
| | | ||
| help: add explicit lifetime `'static` to the type of `x`: `&'static i32` | ||
| --------- ^ ...but this borrow... | ||
| | | ||
| this return type evaluates to the `'static` lifetime... | ||
| | ||
note: ...can't outlive the anonymous lifetime #1 defined on the function body at 3:1 | ||
--> $DIR/must_outlive_least_region_or_bound.rs:3:1 | ||
| | ||
LL | fn elided(x: &i32) -> impl Copy { x } | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
help: you can add a constraint to the return type to make it last less than `'static` and match the anonymous lifetime #1 defined on the function body at 3:1 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Btw... "constraint" here is odd; we typically use "bound" for things in There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We've been using that wording for 6 months, but I agree we could improve on the wording on these errors. |
||
| | ||
LL | fn elided(x: &i32) -> impl Copy + '_ { x } | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
||
error: cannot infer an appropriate lifetime | ||
--> $DIR/must_outlive_least_region_or_bound.rs:6:44 | ||
|
@@ -67,5 +77,5 @@ LL | fn ty_param_wont_outlive_static<T:Debug>(x: T) -> impl Debug + 'static { | |
|
||
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors | ||
|
||
Some errors occurred: E0310, E0621, E0623. | ||
Some errors occurred: E0310, E0623. | ||
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0310`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"evaluates de need of 'static" ?
What is this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A partial rewording of the prior comment 😬
I believe something along the lines of "that evaluates to a need of static".