Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add new diagnostic writer using annotate-snippet library #61407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new diagnostic writer using annotate-snippet library #61407
Changes from all commits
3f727ae
c04a2cc
94c8aa6
4a6b91c
bfe5d97
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @rust-lang/compiler we're pulling in a new dependency here, and we have no control over it:
ansi_term
(annotate-snippets
is also a new dep, but it is under therust-lang
org: https://github.com/rust-lang/annotate-snippets-rs).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two points in favour of allowing it: its license (MIT) is in our list of allowed licenses for external crates; and it is already a transitive dependency of our other core projects such as
cargo
.As long as changes to the
ansi_term
are vetted as part of theannotate-snippets
crate and the crate is locked to a specific patch version I’m in favour of the dependency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The usage of
ansi_term
inannotate-snippets
seems pretty lightweight so far and we could probably switch to another one as well, if that's a concern.