Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Vec::leak #62196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2019
Merged

Add Vec::leak #62196

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2019

Conversation

cramertj
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @withoutboats

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 27, 2019
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 27, 2019
@withoutboats
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

Seems reasonable at least on nightly, its annoying to write by hand.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 27, 2019

📌 Commit 206a384ef058c61f4f9818849fe7a2ed1ef43ff5 has been approved by withoutboats

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 27, 2019
@matklad
Copy link
Member

matklad commented Jun 28, 2019

Am I missing something, or is this just Box::leak(vec.into_boxed_slice())?

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jun 28, 2019

@bors r-

This can be written without the unsafe as per @matklad's comment (even Box::leak(vec.into()) will suffice) and so we should do that in the implementation to reduce the overall trusted computing base.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 28, 2019
@cramertj
Copy link
Member Author

This can be written without the unsafe

Done, thanks for the suggestion.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jun 28, 2019

Thanks!

@bors r=withoutboats,Centril rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 28, 2019

📌 Commit 86d96e33550f8027f80a4ba299c1e97cbd6e0505 has been approved by withoutboats,Centril

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 28, 2019
@cramertj
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=withoutboats,Centril rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 28, 2019

📌 Commit bd10be5 has been approved by withoutboats,Centril

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2019
@Centril

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 28, 2019
@cramertj
Copy link
Member Author

cramertj commented Jul 1, 2019

@bors r=centril,withoutboats

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 1, 2019

📌 Commit 9527565 has been approved by cramertj

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 1, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 1, 2019

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 1, 2019

📌 Commit 9527565 has been approved by centril,withoutboats

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2019
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2019
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2019
Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #62021 (MSVC link output improve)
 - #62064 (nth_back for chunks_exact)
 - #62128 (Adjust warning of -C extra-filename with -o.)
 - #62161 (Add missing links for TryFrom docs)
 - #62183 (std: Move a process test out of libstd)
 - #62186 (Add missing type urls in Into trait)
 - #62196 (Add Vec::leak)
 - #62199 (import gdb for explicit access to gdb.current_objfile())
 - #62229 (Enable intptrcast for explicit casts)
 - #62250 (Improve box clone doctests to ensure the documentation is valid)
 - #62255 (Switch tracking issue for `#![feature(slice_patterns)]`)
 - #62285 (Fix michaelwoerister's mailmap)
 - #62304 (HashMap is UnwindSafe)
 - #62319 (Fix mismatching Kleene operators)
 - #62327 (Fixed document bug, those replaced each other)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 9527565 into rust-lang:master Jul 3, 2019
@cramertj cramertj deleted the vec-leak branch July 3, 2019 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants