Some more cleanups to syntax::print #62532
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
(Feel free to reassign to someone else, I think anyone can do the review for this since it's just cleanup) |
|
This has some conflicts with #62393 (with that PR token and ident printing have some extra arguments and don't fit into |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I can drop those commits -- maybe easiest to just wait after your PR lands? |
|
I'll reassign #62393 to you then, otherwise it's unlikely to land soon. |
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
syntax-print-cleanup
branch
from
3497fb1
to
a47fac4
Compare
|
I've dropped what I think are the conflicting commits from this PR. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
syntax-print-cleanup
branch
from
a47fac4
to
9c67233
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 9c672338e80aee5a437e106917efd5139a56f0a4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #62555) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
attribute_to_string exists.
We always check against the length before indexing anyway.
There was only one callsite for each and this removes the unwrap_or_default's on the comments argument
This also permits sharing the underlying code between pprust and hir::print.
Presumably the code was from an older age of Rust and can now be written much simpler.
These are somewhat ambiguous (beginning/end of what?) so it's better to inline their one use into the code.
This is also easier to understand because the scan and print "tasks" are separate, but previously were both called "print" or "pretty print."
It was always set to the string's length
Also moves it to pp::Printer from PrintState.
We're always indenting by INDENT_UNIT anyway
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
syntax-print-cleanup
branch
from
9c67233
to
56a9237
Compare
|
@bors r=petrochenkov |
|
📌 Commit 56a9237 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2019
…p, r=petrochenkov Some more cleanups to syntax::print All of these changes should be functionally equivalent to previous code. Each commit mostly stands alone and this PR is easiest to review by-commit.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #62275 (rustc_mir: treat DropAndReplace as Drop + Assign in qualify_consts.) - #62465 (Sometimes generate storage statements for temporaries with type `!`) - #62481 (Use `fold` in `Iterator::last` default implementation) - #62493 (#62357: doc(ptr): add example for {read,write}_unaligned) - #62532 (Some more cleanups to syntax::print) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #62275 (rustc_mir: treat DropAndReplace as Drop + Assign in qualify_consts.) - #62465 (Sometimes generate storage statements for temporaries with type `!`) - #62481 (Use `fold` in `Iterator::last` default implementation) - #62493 (#62357: doc(ptr): add example for {read,write}_unaligned) - #62532 (Some more cleanups to syntax::print) Failed merges: r? @ghost
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
…crum Remove unneeded access to pretty printer's `s` field in favor of deref I found it taxing in some of my recent PRs touching the pretty printer to maintain consistency with the surrounding code, since the current code is all over the place about whether it uses `self.s.…()` or `self.…()` for invoking methods of `rustc_ast_pretty::pp::Printer`. This PR standardizes on `self.…()` — relying on the `Deref` and `DerefMut` impls introduced by [rust-lang#62532](rust-lang@cab4532).
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
…crum Remove unneeded access to pretty printer's `s` field in favor of deref I found it taxing in some of my recent PRs touching the pretty printer to maintain consistency with the surrounding code, since the current code is all over the place about whether it uses `self.s.…()` or `self.…()` for invoking methods of `rustc_ast_pretty::pp::Printer`. This PR standardizes on `self.…()` — relying on the `Deref` and `DerefMut` impls introduced by [rust-lang#62532](rust-lang@cab4532).
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
…crum Remove unneeded access to pretty printer's `s` field in favor of deref I found it taxing in some of my recent PRs touching the pretty printer to maintain consistency with the surrounding code, since the current code is all over the place about whether it uses `self.s.…()` or `self.…()` for invoking methods of `rustc_ast_pretty::pp::Printer`. This PR standardizes on `self.…()` — relying on the `Deref` and `DerefMut` impls introduced by [rust-lang#62532](rust-lang@cab4532).
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
…crum Remove unneeded access to pretty printer's `s` field in favor of deref I found it taxing in some of my recent PRs touching the pretty printer to maintain consistency with the surrounding code, since the current code is all over the place about whether it uses `self.s.…()` or `self.…()` for invoking methods of `rustc_ast_pretty::pp::Printer`. This PR standardizes on `self.…()` — relying on the `Deref` and `DerefMut` impls introduced by [rust-lang#62532](rust-lang@cab4532).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All of these changes should be functionally equivalent to previous code.
Each commit mostly stands alone and this PR is easiest to review by-commit.