Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves #64642
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the span where it was moved into the `for` loop, which is `move_span`.
|
r? @varkor (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit c3f72d1 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2019
…rkor Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the span where it was moved into the `for` loop, which is `move_span`. Fixes rust-lang#64559.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2019
…rkor Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the span where it was moved into the `for` loop, which is `move_span`. Fixes rust-lang#64559.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #64010 (Stabilize `param_attrs` in Rust 1.39.0) - #64136 (Document From trait for LhsExpr in parser) - #64342 (factor out pluralisation remains after #64280) - #64347 (Add long error explanation for E0312) - #64621 (Add Compatibility Notes to RELEASES.md for 1.38.0) - #64632 (remove the extra comma after the match arm) - #64640 (No home directory on vxWorks) - #64641 (Exempt extern "Rust" from improper_ctypes) - #64642 (Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was using the snippet from the "use" span, which often renders the
same, but with closures that snippet is on the start of the closure
where the value is captured. We should be using the snippet from the
span where it was moved into the
forloop, which ismove_span.Fixes #64559.