Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia #64787
Merged
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia #64787
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus return codes.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 80db06d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus exit codes. r? @cramertj @alexcrichton
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus exit codes. r? @cramertj @alexcrichton
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus exit codes. r? @cramertj @alexcrichton
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2019
Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own representation of ExitStatus. Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to see bogus exit codes. r? @cramertj @alexcrichton
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fuchsia exit codes don't follow the convention of libc::WEXITSTATUS et
al, and they are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. This gives Fuchsia its own
representation of ExitStatus.
Additionally, the zircon syscall structs were out of date, causing us to
see bogus exit codes.
r? @cramertj @alexcrichton