Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check_match: improve diagnostics for let A = 2; with const A: i32 = 3 #64859

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Sep 28, 2019

For example:

error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `std::i32::MIN..=1i32` and `3i32..=std::i32::MAX` not covered
  --> $DIR/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs:2:9
   |
LL |     let A = 3;
   |         ^
   |         |
   |         interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
   |         help: introduce a variable instead: `a_var`
...
LL |     const A: i32 = 2;
   |     ----------------- constant defined here

r? @estebank
cc @matthiaskrgr @rpjohnst

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 28, 2019
where `A` is a constant, not a new variable.
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2019

📌 Commit aa03f1f has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 28, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2019
…stebank

check_match: improve diagnostics for `let A = 2;` with `const A: i32 = 3`

For example:

```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `std::i32::MIN..=1i32` and `3i32..=std::i32::MAX` not covered
  --> $DIR/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs:2:9
   |
LL |     let A = 3;
   |         ^
   |         |
   |         interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
   |         help: introduce a variable instead: `a_var`
...
LL |     const A: i32 = 2;
   |     ----------------- constant defined here
```

r? @estebank
cc @matthiaskrgr @rpjohnst
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2019
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64703 (Docs: slice elements are equidistant)
 - #64745 (Include message on tests that should panic but do not)
 - #64781 (Remove stray references to the old global tcx)
 - #64794 (Remove unused DepTrackingMap)
 - #64802 (Account for tail expressions when pointing at return type)
 - #64809 (hir: Disallow `target_feature` on constants)
 - #64815 (Fix div_duration() marked as stable by mistake)
 - #64818 (update rtpSpawn's parameters type(It's prototype has been updated in libc))
 - #64830 (Thou shallt not `.abort_if_errors()`)
 - #64836 (Stabilize map_get_key_value feature)
 - #64845 (pin.rs: fix links to primitives in documentation)
 - #64847 (Upgrade env_logger to 0.7)
 - #64851 (Add mailmap entry for Dustin Bensing by request)
 - #64859 (check_match: improve diagnostics for `let A = 2;` with `const A: i32 = 3`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit aa03f1f into rust-lang:master Sep 28, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the const-def-here-new-var branch September 28, 2019 07:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants