-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make try_mark_previous_green aware of cycles. #66846
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
// revisions: rpass cfail | ||
|
||
enum A { | ||
//[cfail]~^ ERROR 3:1: 3:7: recursive type `A` has infinite size [E0072] | ||
B(C), | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[cfg(rpass)] | ||
struct C(Box<A>); | ||
|
||
#[cfg(cfail)] | ||
struct C(A); | ||
//[cfail]~^ ERROR 12:1: 12:13: recursive type `C` has infinite size [E0072] | ||
|
||
fn main() {} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH I do not grasp the reasons of this expectation.
But whatever they are, seems the test is a counter-example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment should be re-worded to "If the query we just forced has resulted in some kind of compilation error, we cannot rely on the dep-node color having been properly updated."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To elaborate: Forcing a query (as we have done when reaching this point in the code) must update the
colors
table with an entry for that query invocation. Reaching theNone
branch here means that we did not find the expected entry in the table, so we abort compilation with thebug!
. However, there seem to be cases when something generated an error while forcing the query where table is not updated. This is supposedly harmless (although it would be great to find out how that happens exactly) because once an error has occurred we don't persist anything to the incremental cache.So the comment should expanded to something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, the new behavior of returning instead of continuing marking is definitely an improvement!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, that makes sense now!