-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make const-qualification look at more const fn
s
#67055
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the unstables ones in libcore, with the unstable feature disabled, were not checked
So that we can bootstrap successfully
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Dec 5, 2019
oli-obk
reviewed
Dec 5, 2019
Lgtm with the comment adjusted to make it clear that the body will otherwise not be checked correctly |
the comment is updated, and CI passed successfully before that, so @bors r=oli-obk |
📌 Commit 2d83b76 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 5, 2019
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2019
Make const-qualification look at more `const fn`s As explained in a lot more detail in rust-lang#67053 this makes const-qualification not ignore the unstable const fns in libcore. r? @oli-obk cc @ecstatic-morse (Still a bit unsure about the `cfg`s here, for bootstrapping, does that seem correct ?) Fixes rust-lang#67053.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #66710 (weak-into-raw: Clarify some details in Safety) - #66863 (Check break target availability when checking breaks with values) - #67002 (Fix documentation of pattern for str::matches()) - #67005 (capitalize Rust) - #67010 (Accurately portray raw identifiers in error messages) - #67011 (Include a span in more `expected...found` notes) - #67044 (E0023: handle expected != tuple pattern type) - #67045 (rustc_parser: cleanup imports) - #67055 (Make const-qualification look at more `const fn`s) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As explained in a lot more detail in #67053 this makes const-qualification not ignore the unstable const fns in libcore.
r? @oli-obk cc @ecstatic-morse
(Still a bit unsure about the
cfg
s here, for bootstrapping, does that seem correct ?)Fixes #67053.