Skip to content

Conversation

matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

newtype_index no longer needs rustc_index::vec::Idx to be in scope.

r? @Centril

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 5, 2020
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@matthewjasper matthewjasper force-pushed the newtype-index-hygiene branch from 443131b to dcbbdd1 Compare January 5, 2020 16:27
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jan 5, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2020

📌 Commit dcbbdd1ba5d05e946c2174375541dddb58349018 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jan 5, 2020

@bors r- ^--- to confirm there's no accidental change here.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 5, 2020
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@matthewjasper matthewjasper force-pushed the newtype-index-hygiene branch from dcbbdd1 to 9462c8b Compare January 6, 2020 20:44
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've fixed the issue and added some unit tests for newtype_index

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jan 6, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 6, 2020

📌 Commit 9462c8b has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 6, 2020
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
…, r=Centril

Improve hygiene of `newtype_index`

`newtype_index` no longer needs `rustc_index::vec::Idx` to be in scope.

r? @Centril
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67566 (Add an unstable conversion from thread ID to u64)
 - #67671 (Account for `type X = impl Trait;` in lifetime suggestion)
 - #67727 (Stabilise vec::remove_item)
 - #67877 (Omit underscore constants from rustdoc)
 - #67880 (Handle multiple error fix suggestions carefuly)
 - #67898 (Improve hygiene of `newtype_index`)
 - #67908 (rustdoc: HTML escape const values)
 - #67909 (Fix ICE in const pretty printing and resolve FIXME)
 - #67929 (Formatting an example for method Vec.retain)
 - #67934 (Clean up E0178 explanation)
 - #67936 (fire "non_camel_case_types" for associated types)
 - #67943 (Missing module std in example.)
 - #67962 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 9462c8b into rust-lang:master Jan 7, 2020
@matthewjasper matthewjasper deleted the newtype-index-hygiene branch January 7, 2020 08:39
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
…gisa

Split MIR building into its own crate

This moves `rustc_mir::{build, hair, lints}` to `rustc_mir_build`.
The new crate only has a `provide` function as it's public API.

Based on rust-lang#67898

cc @Centril @rust-lang/compiler
r? @oli-obk
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2020
Split MIR building into its own crate

This moves `rustc_mir::{build, hair, lints}` to `rustc_mir_build`.
The new crate only has a `provide` function as it's public API.

Based on #67898

cc @Centril @rust-lang/compiler
r? @oli-obk
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants