Rollup of 7 pull requests #68094
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #68094
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The Cargo book can be generated the same way as the other books.
Use `shrink_to_hi` instead of `next_point` Fix rust-lang#68000.
This feature adds `X..`, `..X`, and `..=X` patterns.
Introduce `X..`, `..X`, and `..=X` range patterns Tracking issue: rust-lang#67264 Feature gate: `#![feature(half_open_range_patterns)]` --------------------------- In this PR, we introduce range-from (`X..`), range-to (`..X`), and range-to-inclusive (`..=X`) patterns. These correspond to the `RangeFrom`, `RangeTo`, and `RangeToInclusive` expression forms introduced with the same syntaxes. The correspondence is both syntactic and semantic (in the sense that e.g. a `X..` pattern matching on a scrutinee `s` holds exactly when `(X..).contains(&s)` holds). --------------------------- Noteworthy: - The compiler complexity added with this PR is around 10 lines (discounting new tests, which account for the large PR size). - `...X` is accepted syntactically with the same meaning as `..=X`. This is done primarily to simplify and unify the implementation & spec. If-and-when we decide to make `X...Y` a hard error on a new edition, we can do the same for `...X` patterns as well. - `X...` and `X..=` is rejected syntactically just like it is for the expression equivalents. We should perhaps make these into semantic restrictions (cc @petrochenkov). - In HAIR, these half-open ranges are represented by inserting the max/min values for the approprate types. That is, `X..` where `X: u8` would become `X..=u8::MAX` in HAIR (note the `..=` since `RangeFrom` includes the end). - Exhaustive integer / char matching does not (yet) allow for e.g. exhaustive matching on `0usize..` or `..5usize | 5..` (same idea for `isize`). This would be a substantially more invasive change, and could be added in some other PR. - The issues with slice pattern syntax has been resolved as we decided to use `..` to mean a "rest-pattern" and `[xs @ ..]` to bind the rest to a name in a slice pattern. - Like with rust-lang#35712, which provided `X..Y` range patterns, this is not yet backed up by an RFC. I'm providing this experimental implementation now to have something concrete to discuss. I would be happy to provide an RFC for this PR as well as for rust-lang#35712 to finalize and confirm the ideas with the larger community. Closes rust-lang/rfcs#947. --------------------------- r? @varkor cc @matthewjasper @oli-obk I would recommend reviewing this (in particular HAIR-lowering and pattern parsing changes) with whitespace changes ignored.
…-Simulacrum Build compiletest with in-tree libtest This updates compiletest to build in `Mode::ToolStd`, using the locally-built crates for `std` and especially `test`. This way we're immune to unstable differences in the bootstrap compiler crates, whether that's a prior-release stage0 or a current release local rebuild. Fixes rust-lang#59264. As a minor cleanup, this also removes the unused `llvm_tools` flag.
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation `strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
Canonicalize rustc_error imports r? @Mark-Simulacrum
…ulacrum rustbuild: Cleanup book generation The Cargo book can be generated the same way as the other books.
Do not ICE on unicode next point Use `shrink_to_hi` instead of `next_point`. Fix rust-lang#68000.
|
@bors r+ p=7 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 0d7a792 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit 0d7a792 with merge 8dab749ac529f87cd7f43f3960b0be959bd45228... |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
X..,..X, and..=Xrange patterns #67258 (IntroduceX..,..X, and..=Xrange patterns)Failed merges:
Vec::remove_item#68089 (UnstabilizeVec::remove_item)r? @ghost