Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #69193

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

spunit262 and others added 13 commits February 12, 2020 18:32
The old code hard-coded the transfer function for the initialized places
analyses.
…matthewjasper

Don't give invalid suggestion on desugared span.
…ls2, r=eddyb

Use `ResultsCursor` for `elaborate_drops`

Some cleanup after rust-lang#68241. The old code was using a custom cursor-like struct called `InitializationData`.
…thewjasper

Don't print block exit state in dataflow graphviz if unchanged

A small quality-of-life improvement I was using while working on rust-lang#68528. It's pretty common to have a lot of zero-statement basic blocks, especially before a `SimplifyCfg` pass is run. When the dataflow state was dense, these blocks could take up a lot of vertical space since the full flow state was printed on both entry and exit. After this PR, we only print a block's exit state if it differs from that block's entry state. Take a look at the two basic blocks on the left.

Before:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29463364/74505395-e2d1dd00-4eab-11ea-8006-ec8f0dc9d1b6.png)

After:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29463364/74505277-98506080-4eab-11ea-8d95-5190bc378331.png)
Rename `FunctionRetTy` to `FnRetTy`

As per FIXME comment

r? @Centril
[tiny] parser: `macro_rules` is a weak keyword

r? @Centril
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link
Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

📌 Commit 5f6432b has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 15, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Feb 15, 2020

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 5f6432b with merge 69f150e721d4cb34e9870a4324641a0a0cb603d7...

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Your PR failed (pretty log, raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants