Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

configure: set LLVM flags with a value #69244

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2020
Merged

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Feb 17, 2020

Rather than a boolean --enable-cflags etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use ./configure --llvm-cflags="...".

Rather than a boolean `--enable-cflags` etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use `./configure --llvm-cflags="..."`.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 17, 2020
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Feb 17, 2020

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

AFAICT this was just a bug that wasn't caught in the initial implementation (somewhat unsurprisingly), so seems fine to change. I think the previous behavior was also unusable anyway.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2020

📌 Commit 3a55e88 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2020
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
configure: set LLVM flags with a value

Rather than a boolean `--enable-cflags` etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use `./configure --llvm-cflags="..."`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67272 (recursion_limit parsing handles overflows)
 - #68597 (Simplify `Skip::nth` and `Skip::last` implementations)
 - #68767 (macOS: avoid calling pthread_self() twice)
 - #69175 (Do not ICE when encountering `yield` inside `async` block)
 - #69223 (Ignore GDB versions with broken str printing.)
 - #69244 (configure: set LLVM flags with a value)
 - #69249 (Stabilize {f32, f64}::{LOG2_10, LOG10_2})
 - #69252 (Clean out unused directories for extra disk space)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
configure: set LLVM flags with a value

Rather than a boolean `--enable-cflags` etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use `./configure --llvm-cflags="..."`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67272 (recursion_limit parsing handles overflows)
 - #68597 (Simplify `Skip::nth` and `Skip::last` implementations)
 - #68767 (macOS: avoid calling pthread_self() twice)
 - #69175 (Do not ICE when encountering `yield` inside `async` block)
 - #69223 (Ignore GDB versions with broken str printing.)
 - #69244 (configure: set LLVM flags with a value)
 - #69249 (Stabilize {f32, f64}::{LOG2_10, LOG10_2})
 - #69252 (Clean out unused directories for extra disk space)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 3a55e88 into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2020
@cuviper cuviper deleted the llvm-flags branch April 3, 2020 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants