-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parse: Tweak the function parameter edition check #69896
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 10, 2020
Centril
reviewed
Mar 10, 2020
Centril
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 10, 2020
Move anon-params tests to ui/anon-params.
@bors r=Centril |
📌 Commit 6b27e8d has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Mar 10, 2020
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
parse: Tweak the function parameter edition check Follow-up to rust-lang#69801. Edition of a code fragment is inferred from "the place where the code is written". For individual tokens like edition-specific keywords it may be the span of the token itself ("uninterpolated" span), but for larger code fragments it's probably not, in the test example the trait method is obviously written in "2015 edition code". r? @Centril
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2020
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #66059 (mem::zeroed/uninit: panic on types that do not permit zero-initialization) - #69373 (Stabilize const for integer {to,from}_{be,le,ne}_bytes methods) - #69591 (Use TypeRelating for instantiating query responses) - #69625 (Implement nth, last, and count for iter::Copied) - #69645 (const forget tests) - #69766 (Make Point `Copy` in arithmetic documentation) - #69825 (make `mem::discriminant` const) - #69859 (fix #62456) - #69891 (Exhaustiveness checking, `Matrix::push`: recursively expand or-patterns) - #69896 (parse: Tweak the function parameter edition check) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #69801.
Edition of a code fragment is inferred from "the place where the code is written".
For individual tokens like edition-specific keywords it may be the span of the token itself ("uninterpolated" span), but for larger code fragments it's probably not, in the test example the trait method is obviously written in "2015 edition code".
r? @Centril