-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
save/restore pessimistic_yield
when entering bodies
#70367
Conversation
This flag is used to make the execution order around `+=` operators pessimistic. Failure to save/restore the flag was causing independent async blocks to effect one another, leading to strange ICEs and failed assumptions.
449b583
to
e7f8895
Compare
See #61572 for the original discussion that motivated the |
@Aaron1011 do you think this change makes sense? EDIT: I guess I can infer "yes" from the 👍 reaction =) |
@nikomatsakis: Yeah, this looks good to me. I never considered the possibility of having an async block on the RHS of the expression 😄 |
I don't really follow the logic here to well, but won't we also need to save/restore |
I don't believe we do, because when we enter into a rust/src/librustc_passes/region.rs Line 348 in 2113659
then we drain everything added since that length: rust/src/librustc_passes/region.rs Line 364 in 2113659
In other words, it's a stack, and we never look at what lies on it except the things that were pushed during a particular node. We could add an assertion that the depth of |
Since @Zoxc said they weren't too familiar with this, I'm going to make this r? @Aaron1011 |
@nikomatsakis: Could you add an additional test that has a nested use of async fn bar() {
let mut sum = 0;
sum += {
block_on(async {
baz().await;
let mut inner = 1;
inner += block_on(async {
baz().await;
0
})
})
};
} |
@Aaron1011 done. (Running tests locally now.) |
seems like tests pass |
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for RegionResolutionVisitor<'tcx> { | |||
let outer_ec = mem::replace(&mut self.expr_and_pat_count, 0); | |||
let outer_cx = self.cx; | |||
let outer_ts = mem::take(&mut self.terminating_scopes); | |||
let outer_pessimistic_yield = mem::replace(&mut self.pessimistic_yield, false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a comment linking to #69307?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 563152d has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#67705 (Use unrolled loop for searching NULL in [u16] on Windows) - rust-lang#70367 (save/restore `pessimistic_yield` when entering bodies) - rust-lang#70822 (Don't lint for self-recursion when the function can diverge) - rust-lang#70868 (rustc_codegen_ssa: Refactor construction of linker arguments) - rust-lang#70896 (Implement Chain with Option fuses) - rust-lang#70916 (Support `#[track_caller]` on functions in `extern "Rust" { ... }`) - rust-lang#70918 (rustc_session: forbid lints override regardless of position) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This flag is used to make the execution order around
+=
operatorspessimistic. Failure to save/restore the flag was causing independent
async blocks to effect one another, leading to strange ICEs and failed
assumptions.
Fixes #69307
r? @Zoxc