Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix stage0.txt version number comment #71384

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2020
Merged

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 21, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 21, 2020

📌 Commit 20de922 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 21, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#70998 (Suggest `-> impl Trait` and `-> Box<dyn Trait>` on fn that doesn't return)
 - rust-lang#71236 (Remove unused rustc_serialize::hex module)
 - rust-lang#71366 (Use assoc int consts3)
 - rust-lang#71372 (Fix #! (shebang) stripping account space issue)
 - rust-lang#71384 (Fix stage0.txt version number comment)
 - rust-lang#71390 (Fix incorrect description of E0690)
 - rust-lang#71399 (Clean up E0554 explanation)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 836a64a into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the RalfJung-patch-1 branch April 22, 2020 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants