Rollup of 6 pull requests #71424
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #71424
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These were all build-pass before and don't seem to need it. Helps with rust-lang#62277
This adds a couple of more diagnostic items to be used in Clippy. I chose these particular ones because they were the types which we seem to check for the most in Clippy. I'm not sure if the `cfg_attr(not(test))` is needed, but it was also used for `Vec` and a few other types.
…-obk Detect mistyped associated consts in `Instance::resolve`. *Based on rust-lang#71049 to prevent redundant/misleading downstream errors.* Fixes rust-lang#70942 by refusing to resolve an associated `const` if it doesn't have the same type in the `impl` that it does in the `trait` (which we assume had errored, and `delay_span_bug` guards against bugs).
Correct await span for async-await error reporting Closes rust-lang#71137 r? @tmandry
…-doc-error, r=Dylan-DPC Add error code for inner doc error r? @Dylan-DPC cc @oli-obk
…laumeGomez Moving all rustdoc-ui tests to check-pass These were all build-pass before and don't seem to need it. Helps with rust-lang#62277 <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/rust-lang/rust/71337) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
Clarify unused_doc_comments note on macro invocations The previous error message used to say: <pre> /// doc ^^^^^^^ rustdoc does not generate documentation for <b>macros</b> </pre> Obviously we do generate documentation for macros, such as https://docs.rs/bitflags/1.2.1/bitflags/macro.bitflags.html. It's only macro invocations that don't get their own docs. This PR updates the message to say "rustdoc does not generate documentation for <b>macro invocations</b>". I observe that prior to rust-lang#69084 this used to say "rustdoc does not generate documentation for **macro expansions**", as implemented originally in rust-lang#57882. I don't have a preference between those but I made the commit before looking up the history. r? @Manishearth attn: @yaahc @euclio
…nishearth More diagnostic items for Clippy usage This adds a couple of more diagnostic items to be used in Clippy. I chose these particular ones because they were the types which we seem to check for the most in Clippy. I'm not sure if the `cfg_attr(not(test))` is needed, but it was also used for `Vec` and a few other types. cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#5393 r? @Manishearth
|
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 01fdc88 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Instance::resolve. #70970 (Detect mistyped associated consts inInstance::resolve.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost