Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow types (with lifetimes/generics) in impl_lint_pass #72657

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 31, 2020

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#5279 (comment)

This allows to implement LintPass for types with lifetimes and/or generics. The only thing, I'm not sure of is the LintPass::name function, which now includes the lifetime(s) (which will be '_ most of the time) in the name returned for the lint pass, if it exists. But I don't think that this should be a problem, since the LintPass::name is never used for output for the user (?).

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 27, 2020
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 28, 2020

📌 Commit b124892 has been approved by matthewjasper

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 28, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
…ewjasper

Allow types (with lifetimes/generics) in impl_lint_pass

cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#5279 (comment)

This allows to implement `LintPass` for types with lifetimes and/or generics. The only thing, I'm not sure of is the `LintPass::name` function, which now includes the lifetime(s) (which will be `'_` most of the time) in the name returned for the lint pass, if it exists. But I don't think that this should be a problem, since the `LintPass::name` is never used for output for the user (?).
RalfJung added a commit to RalfJung/rust that referenced this pull request May 30, 2020
…ewjasper

Allow types (with lifetimes/generics) in impl_lint_pass

cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#5279 (comment)

This allows to implement `LintPass` for types with lifetimes and/or generics. The only thing, I'm not sure of is the `LintPass::name` function, which now includes the lifetime(s) (which will be `'_` most of the time) in the name returned for the lint pass, if it exists. But I don't think that this should be a problem, since the `LintPass::name` is never used for output for the user (?).
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 30, 2020
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#72543 (Account for missing lifetime in opaque and trait object return types)
 - rust-lang#72625 (Improve inline asm error diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#72637 (expand `env!` with def-site context)
 - rust-lang#72650 (Sort sidebar elements)
 - rust-lang#72657 (Allow types (with lifetimes/generics) in impl_lint_pass)
 - rust-lang#72666 (Add -Z profile-emit=<path> for Gcov gcda output.)
 - rust-lang#72668 (Fix missing parentheses Fn notation error)
 - rust-lang#72669 (rustc_session: Cleanup session creation)
 - rust-lang#72728 (Make bootstrap aware of relative libdir in stage0 compiler)
 - rust-lang#72757 (rustc_lexer: Optimize shebang detection slightly)
 - rust-lang#72772 (miri validation: clarify valid values of 'char')
 - rust-lang#72773 (Fix is_char_boundary documentation)
 - rust-lang#72777 (rustdoc: remove calls to `local_def_id_from_node_id`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 320de71 into rust-lang:master May 31, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the impl_lint_pass-ty branch May 31, 2020 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants