-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #72768
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 10 pull requests #72768
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Fixes rust-lang#72590 With PR rust-lang#70551, observing a `ty::Error` guarantees that compilation is going to fail. Therefore, there are no soundness impliciations to continuing on when we encounter a `ty::Error` - we can only affect whether or not additional error messags are emitted. By not bailing out, we avoid incorrectly determining that types are `!Sized` when a type error is present, which allows us to avoid emitting additional spurious error messages. The original comment mentioned this code being shared by coherence - howver, this change resulted in no diagnostic changes in any of the existing tests.
Make sure code in `#[test]` blocks counts as a use of a crate.
This reverts commit 5685e4d.
…groups" This reverts commit 30c00fd.
This reverts commit 2af0218.
This reverts commit 7a4c186.
fix comment add newline for tidy fmt error... edit suggestion message change the suggestion message to better handle cases with binding modes Apply suggestions from estebank code review Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com> edits to address source review Apply suggestions from estebank code review #2 Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com> update test files
This adds new optional methods on `Extend`: `extend_one` add a single element to the collection, and `extend_reserve` pre-allocates space for the predicted number of incoming elements. These are used in `Iterator` for `partition` and `unzip` as they shuffle elements one-at-a-time into their respective collections.
Co-authored-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@gmail.com>
…Simulacrum Update RELEASES.md for 1.44.0 ### [Rendered](https://github.com/XAMPPRocky/rust/blob/relnotes-1.44.0/RELEASES.md) r? @Mark-Simulacrum cc @rust-lang/release
Add Extend::{extend_one,extend_reserve} This adds new optional methods on `Extend`: `extend_one` add a single element to the collection, and `extend_reserve` pre-allocates space for the predicted number of incoming elements. These are used in `Iterator` for `partition` and `unzip` as they shuffle elements one-at-a-time into their respective collections.
…=nikomatsakis Don't bail out of trait selection when predicate references an error Fixes rust-lang#72590 With PR rust-lang#70551, observing a `ty::Error` guarantees that compilation is going to fail. Therefore, there are no soundness impliciations to continuing on when we encounter a `ty::Error` - we can only affect whether or not additional error messags are emitted. By not bailing out, we avoid incorrectly determining that types are `!Sized` when a type error is present, which allows us to avoid emitting additional spurious error messages. The original comment mentioned this code being shared by coherence - howver, this change resulted in no diagnostic changes in any of the existing tests.
Fix diagnostics for `@ ..` binding pattern in tuples and tuple structs Fixes rust-lang#72574 Associated rust-lang#72534 rust-lang#72373 Includes a new suggestion with `Applicability::MaybeIncorrect` confidence level. ### Before #### tuple ``` error: `..` patterns are not allowed here --> src/main.rs:4:19 | 4 | (_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^ | = note: only allowed in tuple, tuple struct, and slice patterns error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/main.rs:4:9 | 3 | match x { | - this expression has type `({integer}, {integer}, {integer})` 4 | (_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected a tuple with 3 elements, found one with 2 elements | = note: expected tuple `({integer}, {integer}, {integer})` found tuple `(_, _)` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ``` #### tuple struct ``` error: `..` patterns are not allowed here --> src/main.rs:6:25 | 6 | Binder(_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^ | = note: only allowed in tuple, tuple struct, and slice patterns error[E0023]: this pattern has 2 fields, but the corresponding tuple struct has 3 fields --> src/main.rs:6:9 | 1 | struct Binder(i32, i32, i32); | ----------------------------- tuple struct defined here ... 6 | Binder(_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected 3 fields, found 2 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ``` ### After *Note: final output edited during source review discussion, see thread for details* #### tuple ``` error: `_x @` is not allowed in a tuple --> src/main.rs:4:14 | 4 | (_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^ is only allowed in a slice | help: replace with `..` or use a different valid pattern | 4 | (_a, ..) => {} | ^^ error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/main.rs:4:9 | 3 | match x { | - this expression has type `({integer}, {integer}, {integer})` 4 | (_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected a tuple with 3 elements, found one with 1 element | = note: expected tuple `({integer}, {integer}, {integer})` found tuple `(_,)` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ``` #### tuple struct ``` error: `_x @` is not allowed in a tuple struct --> src/main.rs:6:20 | 6 | Binder(_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^ is only allowed in a slice | help: replace with `..` or use a different valid pattern | 6 | Binder(_a, ..) => {} | ^^ error[E0023]: this pattern has 1 field, but the corresponding tuple struct has 3 fields --> src/main.rs:6:9 | 1 | struct Binder(i32, i32, i32); | ----------------------------- tuple struct defined here ... 6 | Binder(_a, _x @ ..) => {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected 3 fields, found 1 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors ``` r? @estebank
Add test to make sure -Wunused-crate-dependencies works with tests Make sure code in `#[test]` blocks counts as a use of a crate.
…, r=petrochenkov Revert recursive `TokenKind::Interpolated` expansion for now The crater run rust-lang#72622 revealed many root regressions, at least one of which is going to take some time to fix. For now, let's revert rust-lang#72388 to allow the 709 affected crates to continue building on the latest nightly.
Remove unused mut from long-linker-command-lines test
…, r=petrochenkov Remove remaining calls to `as_local_node_id` Split out from rust-lang#72552 cc rust-lang#50928
remove mk_bool
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
📌 Commit 025058f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
May 30, 2020
⌛ Testing commit 025058f with merge 7e517c41ccf0f2f2105013840f9a2c3a078672cf... |
💥 Test timed out |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
May 30, 2020
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 30, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
This was referenced May 30, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
@ ..
binding pattern in tuples and tuple structs #72677 (Fix diagnostics for@ ..
binding pattern in tuples and tuple structs)TokenKind::Interpolated
expansion for now #72724 (Revert recursiveTokenKind::Interpolated
expansion for now)as_local_node_id
#72750 (Remove remaining calls toas_local_node_id
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost