-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mir-opt] Fix mis-optimization and other issues with the SimplifyArmIdentity pass #73949
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e3f599c
Add test for simplify-try misoptimization
wesleywiser 9248d90
[mir-opt] Prevent mis-optimization when SimplifyArmIdentity runs
wesleywiser 24bfdc9
Fix debuginfo so that it points to the correct local
wesleywiser e16d6a6
Fix missing return in `optimization_applies()`
wesleywiser File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ | |
debug x => _1; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:1:8: 1:9 | ||
let mut _0: std::option::Option<std::boxed::Box<()>>; // return place in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:1:31: 1:46 | ||
let mut _2: isize; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:3:9: 3:13 | ||
let _3: std::boxed::Box<()>; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:14: 4:15 | ||
- let _3: std::boxed::Box<()>; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:14: 4:15 | ||
- let mut _4: std::boxed::Box<()>; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:25: 4:26 | ||
- let mut _5: isize; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:6:1: 6:2 | ||
- let mut _6: isize; // in scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:6:1: 6:2 | ||
scope 1 { | ||
debug x => _3; // in scope 1 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:14: 4:15 | ||
debug x => ((_0 as Some).0: std::boxed::Box<()>); // in scope 1 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:14: 4:15 | ||
} | ||
|
||
bb0: { | ||
|
@@ -19,9 +19,7 @@ | |
} | ||
|
||
bb1: { | ||
_3 = move ((_1 as Some).0: std::boxed::Box<()>); // scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:14: 4:15 | ||
((_0 as Some).0: std::boxed::Box<()>) = move _3; // scope 1 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:20: 4:27 | ||
discriminant(_0) = 1; // scope 1 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:20: 4:27 | ||
_0 = move _1; // scope 1 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:4:20: 4:27 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. oh now I realize how this is happening... we were missing optimizations because we were marking them as used because of debuginfo |
||
goto -> bb3; // scope 0 at $DIR/simplify-locals-removes-unused-discriminant-reads.rs:2:5: 5:6 | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are there any
NonUseContext
that are relevant here? The only one left that isn't covered isAscribeUserTy
. So this could just beif let
PlaceContext::NonUse(_) = context` I think.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I guess those are unused after NLL runs right? Maybe we should have a separate pass that runs at the beginning of the optimization phase and removes all of those?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true, and then changing this site to the general match on
NonUseContext
doesn't actually change anything, anymore, so let's do that in a separate PR