-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide structured suggestion on unsized fields and fn params #74228
Conversation
| | ||
LL | value: &T, | ||
| ^ | ||
help: boxed trait objects have a statically known size |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this help slightly misleading? T
is a type parameter, not a trait object here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good point. I could say boxed types have...
and that would be more accurate always at the cost of not giving people some jargon to google... I'll see if I can make it conditional on the type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about "heap allocated types always have a statically known size"? Edit: last commit has this wording.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, I personally don't really like "heap allocated types", as an object of the type is allocated on the heap, not the type itself 😅
Not sure what's the best wording here, but maybe "boxed types always have a statically known size" which seems more correct to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to introduce a bit of jargon here, as Box
is already mentioned in the code suggestion itself, to tie the concept of "heap allocations" and "Box
". That being said I see your point. Lets merge this as is to avoid bitrot (I don't think the wording is outright wrong, just suboptimal), but let's open a follow up PR to improve the wording?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lcnr what about "the Box
type always has a statically known size and allocates its contents in the heap"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, r=me after squashing a little
Should I squash all into one commit or just squash the fixup commits where they belong? |
Whichever you prefer, I tend to do the latter. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 2d0f3eb has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 20, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
Provide structured suggestion on unsized fields and fn params * Suggest borrowing or boxing unsized fields * Suggest borrowing fn parameters * Remove some verbosity of unsized errors * Remove `on_unimplemented` note from `trait Sized` Fix rust-lang#23286, fix rust-lang#28653. r? @davidtwco
@bors r=davidtwco |
📌 Commit ff75395 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 5, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
…arth Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#73759 (Add missing Stdin and StdinLock examples) - rust-lang#74211 (Structured suggestion when not using struct pattern) - rust-lang#74228 (Provide structured suggestion on unsized fields and fn params) - rust-lang#74252 (Don't allow `DESTDIR` to influence LLVM builds) - rust-lang#74263 (Slight reorganization of sys/(fast_)thread_local) - rust-lang#74271 (process_unix: prefer i32::*_be_bytes over manually shifting bytes) - rust-lang#74272 (pprust: support multiline comments within lines) - rust-lang#74332 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#74334 (bootstrap: Improve wording on docs for `verbose-tests`) - rust-lang#74336 (typeck: use `item_name` in cross-crate packed diag) - rust-lang#74340 (lint: use `transparent_newtype_field` to avoid ICE) Failed merges: r? @ghost
on_unimplemented
note fromtrait Sized
Fix #23286, fix #28653.
r? @davidtwco