Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 17 pull requests #74407

Closed
wants to merge 72 commits into from

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

mzohreva and others added 30 commits June 12, 2020 11:26
Currently dependency crates of the standard library can sometimes leak
into error messages such as when traits to import are suggested.
Additionally they can leak into documentation such as in the list of
"all traits implemented by `u32`". The dependencies of the standard
library, however, are intended to be private.

The dependencies of the standard library can't actually be stabl-y
imported nor is the documentation that relevant since you can't import
them on stable either. This commit updates both the compiler and rustdoc
to ignore unstable traits in these two scenarios.

Specifically the suggestion for traits to import ignore unstable traits,
and similarly the list of traits implemented by a type excludes unstable
traits.

This commit is extracted from rust-lang#73441 where the addition of some new
dependencies to the standard library was showed to leak into various
error messages and documentation. The intention here is to go ahead and
land these changes ahead of that since it will likely take some time to
land.
Fixes rust-lang#72684.

This commit also modifies the signature of `Classifier::new` to avoid
copying the source being highlighted.
to avoid surprising listed in API guidelines.
Instead, ignore resolution errors that occur in item bodies.

The reason this can't ignore item bodies altogether is because
`const fn` could be used in generic types, for example `[T; f()]`
- Explicitly check for missing docs
- Don't run any lints except those we explicitly specified
- Remove unnecessary `should_loop` variable
- Report errors for trait implementations

These should give resolution errors because they are visible outside the
current scope. Without these errors, rustdoc will give ICEs:

```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempted .def_id() on invalid res: Err', /home/joshua/src/rust/src/libstd/macros.rs:16:9
  15: rustc_hir::def::Res<Id>::def_id
             at /home/joshua/src/rust/src/librustc_hir/def.rs:382
  16: rustdoc::clean::utils::register_res
             at src/librustdoc/clean/utils.rs:627
  17: rustdoc::clean::utils::resolve_type
             at src/librustdoc/clean/utils.rs:587
```

- Add much more extensive tests
  + fn -> impl -> fn
  + fn -> impl -> fn -> macro
  + errors in function parameters
  + errors in trait bounds
  + errors in the type implementing the trait
  + unknown bounds for the type
  + unknown types in function bodies
  + errors generated by macros

- Use explicit state instead of trying to reconstruct it from random info
- Use an enum instead of a boolean
- Add example of ignored error
Instead, report the error.

This emits the errors on-demand, without special-casing `impl Trait`, so
it should catch all ICEs of this kind, including ones that haven't been
found yet.

Since the error is emitted during type-checking there is less info about
the error; see comments in the code for details.

- Add test case for -> impl Trait
- Add test for impl trait with alias
- Move EmitIgnoredResolutionErrors to rustdoc

This makes `fn typeck_item_bodies` public, which is not desired behavior.
That change should be removed once
rust-lang#74070 is merged.

- Don't visit nested closures twice
Previously, rustdoc would issue a delay_span_bug ICE on the following code:

```rust
pub fn a() -> impl Fn() -> u32 {
    || content::doesnt::matter()
}
```

This wasn't picked up earlier because having `type Alias = impl Trait;`
in the same module caused _all closures_ to be typechecked, even if they
wouldn't normally. Additionally, if _any_ error was emitted, no
delay_span_bug would be emitted. So as part of this commit all of the
tests were separated out into different files.
Just use a boolean instead.
Previously two different parts of the context had to be passed
separately; there were two sources of truth.
TyCtxt is a reference type and so can be passed by value.
Don't panic if the lhs of a div by zero is not statically known

Fixes rust-lang#73993 for real this time

r? @wesleywiser
…debar, r=kinnison

Focus on the current file in the source file sidebar

Fixes rust-lang#73360.

r? @kinnison
cc @rust-lang/rustdoc
…eGomez

rustdoc: Rename internal API fns to `into_string`

to avoid surprising listed in API guidelines.
…meGomez

Reintroduce spotlight / "important traits" feature

(Reopened version of rust-lang#74111 because Github is broken, see discussion there)

Fixes rust-lang#73785

This PR reintroduces the "spotlight" ("important traits") feature.

A couple changes have been made:

As there were concerns about its visibility, it has been moved to be next to the return type, as opposed to being on the side.

It also no longer produces a modal, it shows the traits on hover, and it can be clicked on to pin the hover bubble.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1617736/86674555-a82d2600-bfad-11ea-9a4a-a1a9ffd66ae5.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1617736/86674533-a1061800-bfad-11ea-9e8a-c62ad86ed0d7.png)

It also works fine on mobile:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1617736/86674638-bda25000-bfad-11ea-8d8d-1798b608923e.png)
Fix typo in std::mem::transmute documentation

`u32::from_ge_bytes` function does not exist; replace with `u32::from_be_bytes`.
It is clear that `u32::from_le_bytes` is not meant from the context; the latter is used correctly while `from_be_bytes` is misspelled.
…lacrum

BtreeMap: superficially refactor root access

Remove or comment every unwrap in BTreeMap's main code and more.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum
…roalbini

Bump version to 1.47

This also bumps to a more recent rustfmt version, just to keep us relatively up to date (though almost nothing has changed in rustfmt we use beyond bumps to the parser infra). No formatting changes as a result of this.

r? @pietroalbini
…r=Mark-Simulacrum

Set shell for github actions CI

r? @pietroalbini but because this seems at worst harmless and CI is broken self approving
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot modify labels: +rollup
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

📌 Commit c7e85bb has been approved by Manishearth

@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jul 16, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 5, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 16, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c7e85bb with merge 15fe6f0a26db42aca6e062a03326f9519fc8d4c8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 16, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

missing libz, but it happened during prepare so it might be intermittent

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 16, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c7e85bb with merge e1c565330a28b05009fb6b0b3e68fb91bedc9024...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 16, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

I bet it's the 1.27 one

@Manishearth Manishearth deleted the rollup-0bxc3pe branch July 18, 2020 01:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.