-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the default stage for x.py configurable #76625
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jyn514
added
the
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
label
Sep 12, 2020
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Sep 12, 2020
jyn514
force-pushed
the
default-stages
branch
from
September 12, 2020 02:20
d9290b0
to
52e9fb4
Compare
pickfire
reviewed
Sep 12, 2020
pickfire
reviewed
Sep 12, 2020
Merged
pickfire
reviewed
Sep 12, 2020
pickfire
reviewed
Sep 13, 2020
Could you squash the commits here? r=me with that done |
This allows configuring the default stage for each sub-command individually. - Normalize the stage as early as possible, so there's no confusion about which to use. - Don't add an explicit `stage` option in config.toml This offers no more flexibility than `*_stage` and makes it confusing which takes precedence. - Always give `--stage N` precedence over config.toml - Fix bootstrap tests This changes the tests to go through `Config::parse` so that they test the actual defaults, not the dummy ones provided by `default_opts`. To make this workable (and independent of the environment), it does not read `config.toml` for tests.
jyn514
force-pushed
the
default-stages
branch
from
September 15, 2020 15:21
ea59ec1
to
328c61c
Compare
@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum |
📌 Commit 328c61c has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 15, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2020
…acrum Make the default stage for x.py configurable This also allows configuring each sub-command individually. Possibly rust-lang#76617 should land before this? I don't feel strongly either way, I don't mind waiting. Closes rust-lang#76165. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
⌛ Testing commit 328c61c with merge c93c3d91c8202c1111d06e5534c39b1859b3a91a... |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This also allows configuring each sub-command individually.
Possibly #76617 should land before this? I don't feel strongly either way, I don't mind waiting.
Closes #76165.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum