Skip to content

Check for missing const-stability attributes in rustc_passes #77203

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 27, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_mir/src/const_eval/fn_queries.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ pub fn is_min_const_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> bool {
None => {
if let Some(stab) = tcx.lookup_stability(def_id) {
if stab.level.is_stable() {
tcx.sess.span_err(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we just span_bug! here now, or is it still reachable even if the stability error was reported?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function is called in check_unsafety, which runs before MissingStabilityAnnotations.

tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(
tcx.def_span(def_id),
"stable const functions must have either `rustc_const_stable` or \
`rustc_const_unstable` attribute",
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions compiler/rustc_mir/src/transform/check_consts/validation.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -204,9 +204,6 @@ impl Validator<'mir, 'tcx> {
pub fn check_body(&mut self) {
let ConstCx { tcx, body, def_id, .. } = *self.ccx;

// HACK: This function has side-effects???? Make sure we call it.
let _ = crate::const_eval::is_min_const_fn(tcx, def_id.to_def_id());

// The local type and predicate checks are not free and only relevant for `const fn`s.
if self.const_kind() == hir::ConstContext::ConstFn {
// Prevent const trait methods from being annotated as `stable`.
38 changes: 31 additions & 7 deletions compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -368,6 +368,21 @@ impl<'tcx> MissingStabilityAnnotations<'tcx> {
self.tcx.sess.span_err(span, &format!("{} has missing stability attribute", descr));
}
}

fn check_missing_const_stability(&self, hir_id: HirId, span: Span) {
let stab_map = self.tcx.stability();
let stab = stab_map.local_stability(hir_id);
if stab.map_or(false, |stab| stab.level.is_stable()) {
let const_stab = stab_map.local_const_stability(hir_id);
if const_stab.is_none() {
self.tcx.sess.span_err(
span,
"`#[stable]` const functions must also be either \
`#[rustc_const_stable]` or `#[rustc_const_unstable]`",
);
}
}
}
}

impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for MissingStabilityAnnotations<'tcx> {
@@ -378,14 +393,23 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for MissingStabilityAnnotations<'tcx> {
}

fn visit_item(&mut self, i: &'tcx Item<'tcx>) {
match i.kind {
// Inherent impls and foreign modules serve only as containers for other items,
// they don't have their own stability. They still can be annotated as unstable
// and propagate this unstability to children, but this annotation is completely
// optional. They inherit stability from their parents when unannotated.
hir::ItemKind::Impl { of_trait: None, .. } | hir::ItemKind::ForeignMod(..) => {}
// Inherent impls and foreign modules serve only as containers for other items,
// they don't have their own stability. They still can be annotated as unstable
// and propagate this unstability to children, but this annotation is completely
// optional. They inherit stability from their parents when unannotated.
if !matches!(
i.kind,
hir::ItemKind::Impl { of_trait: None, .. } | hir::ItemKind::ForeignMod(..)
) {
self.check_missing_stability(i.hir_id, i.span);
}

_ => self.check_missing_stability(i.hir_id, i.span),
// Ensure `const fn` that are `stable` have one of `rustc_const_unstable` or
// `rustc_const_stable`.
if self.tcx.features().staged_api
&& matches!(&i.kind, hir::ItemKind::Fn(sig, ..) if sig.header.is_const())
{
self.check_missing_const_stability(i.hir_id, i.span);
}

intravisit::walk_item(self, i)
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/stability-attribute/missing-const-stability.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
#![feature(staged_api)]

#![stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]

#[stable(feature = "foo", since = "1.0.0")]
pub const fn foo() {}
//~^ ERROR rustc_const_stable

#[unstable(feature = "bar", issue = "none")]
pub const fn bar() {} // ok

fn main() {}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
error: `#[stable]` const functions must also be either `#[rustc_const_stable]` or `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:6:1
|
LL | pub const fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error