Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify availability of atomic operations #79119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jamesmunns
Copy link
Member

This was noticed while we were updating the embedded rust book: https://github.com/rust-embedded/book/pull/273/files

These targets do natively have atomic load/stores, but do not support CAS operations.

This was noticed while we were updating the embedded rust book: https://github.com/rust-embedded/book/pull/273/files

These targets do natively have atomic load/stores, but do not support CAS operations.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 17, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 19, 2020

📌 Commit 69477f5 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Clarify availability of atomic operations

This was noticed while we were updating the embedded rust book: https://github.com/rust-embedded/book/pull/273/files

These targets do natively have atomic load/stores, but do not support CAS operations.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Clarify availability of atomic operations

This was noticed while we were updating the embedded rust book: https://github.com/rust-embedded/book/pull/273/files

These targets do natively have atomic load/stores, but do not support CAS operations.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79119 (Clarify availability of atomic operations)
 - rust-lang#79123 (Add u128 and i128 integer tests)
 - rust-lang#79177 (Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments)
 - rust-lang#79181 (rustdoc: add [src] links to methods on a trait's page)
 - rust-lang#79183 (Make compiletest testing use the local sysroot)
 - rust-lang#79185 (expand/resolve: Pre-requisites to "Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute")
 - rust-lang#79193 (Revert rust-lang#78969 "Normalize function type during validation")
 - rust-lang#79194 (Make as{_mut,}_slice on array::IntoIter public)
 - rust-lang#79204 (Add jyn514 email alias to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#79212 (Move `rustc_ty` -> `rustc_ty_utils`)
 - rust-lang#79217 (Add the "memcpy" doc alias to slice::copy_from_slice)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 138e96d into rust-lang:master Nov 20, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants