-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #79319
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 10 pull requests #79319
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit also makes fields of `Take` private. I have no idea why they were `pub(super)` before.
Some UI tests started failing after moving iterator adapters to different modules.
Yes, the order of evaluation *does* change depending on the types of the operands. Cursed, I know. I've elected to place this test into `expr/compound-assignment` creating both the `expr` directory and the `compound-assignment` directory. I plan in a future PR to also move the `if` directory and the loose `if` tests into `expr/if` and other similar cleanups of the `test/ui` directory. Future work: Test more than just `+=`, but all operators. I don't know if using a macro to generate these tests cases would be okay or not, but it'd be boilerplatey without it. I'm also confident you cannot change the evaluation order of one operator without changing all of them. Future work: Additionally, test more than just `i32 += i32` for the primitive version. I don't actually know the full set of primitive implementations, but I imagine there's enough to cause a combinatorial explosion with the previous future work item. Somewhere on the order of one to two hundred individual functions.
Stabilizes rust-lang#67521. In particular the following stable methods are stabilized as const fn: * size * align * from_size_align
Add f{32,64}::is_subnormal The docs recommend that you use dedicated methods instead of calling `classify` directly, although there isn't actually a way of checking if a number is subnormal without calling classify. There are dedicated methods for all other forms, excluding `is_zero` (which is just `== 0.0` anyway).
…=m-ou-se Split each iterator adapter and source into individual modules This PR creates individual modules for each iterator adapter and iterator source. This is done to enhance the readability of corresponding modules (`adapters/mod.rs` and `sources.rs`) which were hard to navigate and read because of lots of repeated lines (e.g.: `adapters/mod.rs` was 3k lines long). This is also in line with some adapters which already had their own modules (`Flatten`, `FlatMap`, `Chain`, `Zip`, `Fuse`). This PR also makes `Take`s adapter fields private (I have no idea why they were `pub(super)` before). r? ``@LukasKalbertodt``
Stabilize alloc::Layout const functions Stabilizes rust-lang#67521. In particular the following stable methods are stabilized as `const fn`: * `size` * `align` * `from_size_align` Stabilizing `size` and `align` should not be controversial as they are simple (usize and NonZeroUsize) fields and I don't think there's any reason to make them not const compatible in the future. That being true, the other methods are trivially `const`. The only other issue being returning a `Result` from a `const fn` but this has been made more usable by recent stabilizations.
…r=m-ou-se Stabilize refcell_take Tracking Issue: rust-lang#71395 ``@KodrAus`` nominated this for FCP, so here's a PR! I've never made a stabilization PR, so please mention if there's anything I can improve, thanks.
Clean up `StructuralEq` docs
…mulacrum BTreeMap: address namespace conflicts Fix an annoyance popping up whenever synchronizing the test cases with a version capable of miri-track-raw-pointers. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…gn, r=Mark-Simulacrum Add test for eval order for a+=b Yes, the order of evaluation *does* change depending on the types of the operands. Cursed, I know. I've elected to place this test into `expr/compound-assignment` creating both the `expr` directory and the `compound-assignment` directory. I plan in a future PR to also move the `if` directory and the loose `if` tests into `expr/if` and other similar cleanups of the `test/ui` directory. Future work: Test more than just `+=`, but all operators. I don't know if using a macro to generate these tests cases would be okay or not, but it'd be boilerplatey without it. I'm also confident you cannot change the evaluation order of one operator without changing all of them. Future work: Additionally, test more than just `i32 += i32` for the primitive version. I don't actually know the full set of primitive implementations, but I imagine there's enough to cause a combinatorial explosion with the previous future work item. Somewhere on the order of one to two hundred individual functions.
…ulacrum BTreeMap: fix minor testing mistakes in rust-lang#78903 Mostly a duplicate test case r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…mulacrum BTreeMap: swap the names of NodeRef::new and Root::new_leaf rust-lang#78104 preserved the name of Root::new_leaf to minimize changes, but the resulting names are confusing. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Stabilise `then` Stabilises the lazy variant of rust-lang#64260 now that the FCP [has ended](rust-lang#64260 (comment)). I've kept the original feature gate `bool_to_option` for the strict variant (`then_some`), and created a new insta-stable feature gate `lazy_bool_to_option` for `then`.
@bors r+ p=10 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 41c033b has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Nov 22, 2020
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Nov 23, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
StructuralEq
docs #78793 (Clean upStructuralEq
docs)then
#79299 (Stabilisethen
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup