-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix --pretty=expanded with --remap-path-prefix #80859
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @davidtwco (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jan 10, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
jsgf
force-pushed
the
fix-pretty-remap
branch
from
January 10, 2021 02:25
0b5de28
to
075f728
Compare
Per rust-lang#80832, using --pretty=expanded and --remap-path-prefix results in an ICE. This is becasue the session source files table is stored in remapped form, whereas --pretty-expanded looks up unremapped files. This remaps the path prefixes before lookup.
jsgf
force-pushed
the
fix-pretty-remap
branch
from
January 10, 2021 02:56
075f728
to
d1bfbab
Compare
davidtwco
requested changes
Jan 11, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, r=me after minor change
jsgf
force-pushed
the
fix-pretty-remap
branch
from
January 11, 2021 18:45
d1bfbab
to
d7ce9d5
Compare
davidtwco
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2021
Thanks! @bors r+ |
📌 Commit d7ce9d5 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 12, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#78901 (diagnostics: Note capturing closures can't be coerced to fns) - rust-lang#79588 (Provide more information for HRTB lifetime errors involving closures) - rust-lang#80232 (Remove redundant def_id lookups) - rust-lang#80662 (Added support for i386-unknown-linux-gnu and i486-unknown-linux-gnu) - rust-lang#80736 (use Once instead of Mutex to manage capture resolution) - rust-lang#80796 (Update to LLVM 11.0.1) - rust-lang#80859 (Fix --pretty=expanded with --remap-path-prefix) - rust-lang#80922 (Revert "Auto merge of rust-lang#76896 - spastorino:codegen-inline-fns2) - rust-lang#80924 (Fix rustdoc --test-builder argument parsing) - rust-lang#80935 (Rename `rustc_middle::lint::LevelSource` to `LevelAndSource`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per #80832, using
--pretty=expanded and --remap-path-prefix results in an ICE.
This is becasue the session source files table is stored in remapped
form, whereas --pretty-expanded looks up unremapped files. This remaps
the path prefixes before lookup.
There don't appear to be any existing tests for --pretty=expanded; I'll look intoNever mind, found the pretty tests.adding some.
Fixes #80832