Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BTreeMap: lightly refactor the split_off implementation #81361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2021

Conversation

ssomers
Copy link
Contributor

@ssomers ssomers commented Jan 25, 2021

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 25, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2021

📌 Commit b20f468 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 8, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 8, 2021

⌛ Testing commit b20f468 with merge a270444...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing a270444 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 9, 2021
@bors bors merged commit a270444 into rust-lang:master Feb 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Feb 9, 2021
@bors bors mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2021
@ssomers ssomers deleted the btree_drainy_refactor_7 branch February 9, 2021 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants