Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove redundant option/result wrapping of return values #82367

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 22, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

If a function always returns Ok(something), we can return something directly and remove the corresponding error handling in the callers.
clippy::unnecessary_wraps

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 21, 2021
compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 21, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 21, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 22, 2021

📌 Commit da9a588 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 22, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#82098 (Add internal `collect_into_array[_unchecked]` to remove duplicate code)
 - rust-lang#82228 (Provide NonZero_c_* integers)
 - rust-lang#82287 (Make "missing field" error message more natural)
 - rust-lang#82351 (Use the first paragraph, instead of cookie-cutter text, for rustdoc descriptions)
 - rust-lang#82353 (rustdoc: Remove unnecessary `Cell` around `param_env`)
 - rust-lang#82367 (remove redundant option/result wrapping of return values)
 - rust-lang#82372 (improve UnsafeCell docs)
 - rust-lang#82379 (Fix sizes of repr(C) enums on hexagon)
 - rust-lang#82382 (rustdoc: Remove `fake_def_ids` RefCell)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1870b3b into rust-lang:master Feb 22, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Feb 22, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2021
expand: Do not allocate `Lrc` for `allow_internal_unstable` list unless necessary

This allocation is done for any macro defined in the current crate, or used from a different crate.
EDIT: This also removes an `Lrc` increment from each *use* of such macro, which may be more significant.
Noticed when reviewing rust-lang#82367.
This probably doesn't matter, but let's do a perf run.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants