Update outdated comment in unix Command. #82464
Merged
+7
−17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @kennytm (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 476c6c2 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2021
Update outdated comment in unix Command. The big comment in the `Command` struct has been incorrect for some time (at least since rust-lang#46789 which removed `envp`). Rather than try to remove the allocations, this PR just updates the comment to reflect reality. There is an explanation for the reasoning at rust-lang#31409 (comment), discussing the potential of being able to call `Command::exec` after `libc::fork`. That can still be done in the future, but I think for now it would be good to just correct the comment.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#82269 (Cleanup `PpMode` and friends) - rust-lang#82431 (Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 when running `treat-err-as-bug` tests) - rust-lang#82441 (Fix typo in sanitizer flag in unstable book.) - rust-lang#82463 (panic_bounds_checks should be panic_bounds_check) - rust-lang#82464 (Update outdated comment in unix Command.) - rust-lang#82467 (library: Normalize safety-for-unsafe-block comments) - rust-lang#82468 (Move pick_by_value_method docs above function header) - rust-lang#82484 (rustdoc: Remove duplicate "List of all items") - rust-lang#82502 (Only look for HTML `tidy` when running rustdoc tests) - rust-lang#82503 (fix typo in `pre-commit.sh`) - rust-lang#82510 (Fix typo in `param_env_reveal_all_normalized`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The big comment in the
Commandstruct has been incorrect for some time (at least since #46789 which removedenvp). Rather than try to remove the allocations, this PR just updates the comment to reflect reality. There is an explanation for the reasoning at #31409 (comment), discussing the potential of being able to callCommand::execafterlibc::fork. That can still be done in the future, but I think for now it would be good to just correct the comment.