Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix building problems in extra::unicode. #8260

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix building problems in extra::unicode. #8260

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

omasanori
Copy link
Contributor

WIth this patch RUSTFLAGS='--cfg unicode' make check" passed successfully.

  • Why doesn't #[link_name="icuuc"] make libextra to link against libicuuc.so?
  • In extra::unicode::tests, use unicode; unicode::is_foo('a') failed but use unicode::*; is_foo('a') succeeded. Is it right?

Signed-off-by: OGINO Masanori <masanori.ogino@gmail.com>
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2013
WIth this patch `RUSTFLAGS='--cfg unicode' make check"` passed successfully.

* Why doesn't `#[link_name="icuuc"]` make libextra to link against libicuuc.so?
* In `extra::unicode::tests`, `use unicode; unicode::is_foo('a')` failed but `use unicode::*; is_foo('a')` succeeded. Is it right?
@bors bors closed this Aug 4, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2022
Downgrade mutex_atomic to nursery

See rust-lang#1516 and rust-lang#4295.

There are suggestions about removing this lint from the default warned lints in both issues.
Also, [`mutex_integer`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#mutex_integer) lint that has the same problems as this lint is in `nursery` group.

changelog: Moved [`mutex_atomic`] to `nursery`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants