Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use RWlock when accessing os::env (take 2) #83121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

the8472
Copy link
Member

@the8472 the8472 commented Mar 14, 2021

This reverts commit acdca31 (#82877) i.e. redoes #81850 since the invalid unlock attempts in the child process have been fixed in #82949

r? @joshtriplett

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 14, 2021
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2021

📌 Commit e22143c has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 15, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2021

⌛ Testing commit e22143c with merge 107896c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: joshtriplett
Pushing 107896c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 15, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 107896c into rust-lang:master Mar 15, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Mar 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants