Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 11 pull requests #83287

Closed
wants to merge 24 commits into from

Conversation

Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

clehner and others added 24 commits February 21, 2021 13:36
This also relaxes the bounds on some structs and moves them to the impl
block instead.
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.

Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.

The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`

The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation,
where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to
the type of the closure _argument_.
Add license metadata for std dependencies

These five crates are in the dependency tree of `std` but lack license metadata:
- `alloc`
- `core`
- `panic_abort`
- `panic_unwind`
- `unwind`

Querying the dependency tree of `std` is a useful thing to be able to do, since these crates will typically be linked into Rust binaries. Tools show the license fields missing, as seen in rust-lang#67014 (comment). This PR adds the license field for the five crates, based on the license of the `std` package and this repo as a whole. I also added the `repository` and `descriptions` fields, since those seem useful. For `description`, I copied text from top-level comments for the respective modules - except for `unwind` which has none.

I also note that rust-lang#73530 attempted to add license metadata for all crates in this repo, but was rejected because there was question about some of them. I hope that this smaller change, focusing only on the runtime dependencies, will be easier to review.

cc ```@Mark-Simulacrum``` ```@Lokathor```
Reuse `std::sys::unsupported::pipe` on `hermit`

Pipes are not supported on `hermit` and `hermit/pipe.rs` is identical to `unsupported/pipe.rs`. This PR reduces duplication between the two by doing the following on `hermit`:

```rust
#[path = "../unsupported/pipe.rs"]
pub mod pipe;
```
Attempt to gather similar stats as rusage on Windows

A follow up to rust-lang#82532. This is a bit hacked in because I think we need to discuss this before merging, but this is an attempt to gather similar metrics as `libc::rusage` on Windows.

Some comments on differences:
* Currently, we're passing `RUSAGE_CHILDREN` to `rusage` which collects statistics on all children that have been waited on and terminated. I believe this is currently just the invocation of the real `rustc` that the shim is wrapping. Does `rustc` itself spawn children processes? The windows version gets the child processes handle when spawning it, and uses that to collect the statistics. For maxrss, `rusage` will return "the resident set size of the largest child, not the maximum resident set size of the process tree.", the Windows version will only collect statistics on the wrapped `rustc` child process directly even if some theoretical sub process has a larger memory footprint.
* There might be subtle differences between `rusage`'s "resident set" and Window's "working set". The "working set" and "resident set" should both be the number of pages that are in memory and which would not cause a page fault when accessed.
* I'm not yet sure how best to get the same information that `ru_minflt`, `ru_inblock`, `ru_oublock`, `ru_nivcsw ` and `ru_nvcsw` provide.

r? ````@pnkfelix````
…chenkov

Remove unwrap_none/expect_none from compiler/.

We're not going to stabilize `Option::{unwrap_none, expect_none}`. (See rust-lang#62633.) This removes the usage of those unstable methods from `compiler/`.
Clarify docs for Read::read's return value

Right now the docs for `Read::read`'s return value are phrased in a way that makes it easy for the reader to assume that the return value is never larger than the passed buffer. This PR clarifies that this is a requirement for implementations of the trait, but that callers have to expect a buggy yet safe implementation failing to do so, especially if unchecked accesses to the buffer are done afterwards.

I fell into this trap recently, and when I noticed, I looked at the docs again and had the feeling that I might not have been the first one to miss this.

The same issue of trusting the return value of `read` was also present in std itself for about 2.5 years and only fixed recently, see rust-lang#80895.

I hope that clarifying the docs might help others to avoid this issue.
…enkov

Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web`

Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.

Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.

The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`

The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
…iplett

Move some test-only code to test files

Split out from rust-lang#83185.
Deprecate std::os::haiku::raw, which accidentally wasn't deprecated

In early 2016, all `std::os::*::raw` modules [were deprecated](rust-lang@aa23c98) in accordance with [RFC 1415](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1415-trim-std-os.md). However, at this same time support for Haiku was being added to libstd, landing shortly after the aforementioned commit, and due to some crossed wires a `std::os::haiku::raw` module was added and was not marked as deprecated.

I have been in correspondence with the author of the Haiku patch, `@nielx,` who has confirmed that this was simply an oversight and that the definitions from the libc crate should be preferred instead.
…_doc, r=joshtriplett

Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while

One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_.

This PR just changes a single word in documentation.

``@rustbot`` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 19, 2021
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link
Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2021

📌 Commit f40e8dc has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 19, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2021

⌛ Testing commit f40e8dc with merge 9f011407f71f423a9017616d22f62a766176a8a0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 19, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 19, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.