-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 11 pull requests #83300
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 11 pull requests #83300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ad for collecting iterators
and replace it with `extended_key_value_attributes` feature.
This also relaxes the bounds on some structs and moves them to the impl block instead.
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_.
Reuse `std::sys::unsupported::pipe` on `hermit` Pipes are not supported on `hermit` and `hermit/pipe.rs` is identical to `unsupported/pipe.rs`. This PR reduces duplication between the two by doing the following on `hermit`: ```rust #[path = "../unsupported/pipe.rs"] pub mod pipe; ```
…chenkov Remove unwrap_none/expect_none from compiler/. We're not going to stabilize `Option::{unwrap_none, expect_none}`. (See rust-lang#62633.) This removes the usage of those unstable methods from `compiler/`.
…n514 rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes Fixes rust-lang#81205. It now allows to have: ```rust #[doc(alias = "x")] // and: #[doc(alias("y", "z"))] ``` cc `@jplatte` r? `@jyn514`
Clarify docs for Read::read's return value Right now the docs for `Read::read`'s return value are phrased in a way that makes it easy for the reader to assume that the return value is never larger than the passed buffer. This PR clarifies that this is a requirement for implementations of the trait, but that callers have to expect a buggy yet safe implementation failing to do so, especially if unchecked accesses to the buffer are done afterwards. I fell into this trap recently, and when I noticed, I looked at the docs again and had the feeling that I might not have been the first one to miss this. The same issue of trusting the return value of `read` was also present in std itself for about 2.5 years and only fixed recently, see rust-lang#80895. I hope that clarifying the docs might help others to avoid this issue.
…enkov Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web` Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web` crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of `actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of `pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use. Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case, bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of `pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency on a newer version of `syn`. The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml` The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the `actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can simply update `syn` themselves.
…iplett Move some test-only code to test files Split out from rust-lang#83185.
use checkout@v2 in CI for master Updates CI workflow to use checkout@v2 from v1 (as other parts of CI) for master, plus slightly faster checkout as result compare v2 https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2113902859/logs and v1 logs https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2115229351/logs
Fix gitattibutes for old git versions
Deprecate std::os::haiku::raw, which accidentally wasn't deprecated In early 2016, all `std::os::*::raw` modules [were deprecated](rust-lang@aa23c98) in accordance with [RFC 1415](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1415-trim-std-os.md). However, at this same time support for Haiku was being added to libstd, landing shortly after the aforementioned commit, and due to some crossed wires a `std::os::haiku::raw` module was added and was not marked as deprecated. I have been in correspondence with the author of the Haiku patch, ```@nielx,``` who has confirmed that this was simply an oversight and that the definitions from the libc crate should be preferred instead.
Remove unnecessary `forward_inner_docs` hack and replace it with `extended_key_value_attributes` feature. This is rust-lang#79150, but for compiler/.
…_doc, r=joshtriplett Fix typo/inaccuracy in the documentation of Iterator::skip_while One of the examples used to say “this leads to a possibly confusing situation, where the type of the closure is a double reference” while _actually_ referring to the type of the closure _argument_. This PR just changes a single word in documentation. ````@rustbot```` modify labels: A-iterators, T-doc, T-lang
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
📌 Commit ee3622d has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Mar 19, 2021
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
std::sys::unsupported::pipe
onhermit
#82500 (Reusestd::sys::unsupported::pipe
onhermit
)proc_macro_back_compat
lint toactix-web
#83179 (Extendproc_macro_back_compat
lint toactix-web
)forward_inner_docs
hack #83230 (Remove unnecessaryforward_inner_docs
hack)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup