-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[stable] 1.51.0 release #83377
Merged
Merged
[stable] 1.51.0 release #83377
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit fixes an issue pointed out in rust-lang#82758 where LTO changed the behavior of a program. It turns out that LTO was not at fault here, it simply uncovered an existing bug. The bindings to `__wasilibc_find_relpath` assumed that the relative portion of the path returned was always contained within thee input `buf` we passed in. This isn't actually the case, however, and sometimes the relative portion of the path may reference a sub-portion of the input string itself. The fix here is to use the relative path pointer coming out of `__wasilibc_find_relpath` as the source of truth. The `buf` used for local storage is discarded in this function and the relative path is copied out unconditionally. We might be able to get away with some `Cow`-like business or such to avoid the extra allocation, but for now this is probably the easiest patch to fix the original issue.
|
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 22, 2021
@bors r+ rollup=never p=100 |
📌 Commit f9dd96d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 22, 2021
⌛ Testing commit f9dd96d with merge 03fe4856d159571093c62482ed114d77aa1c275c... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 22, 2021
@bors retry - spurious empty builder |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 22, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also includes backports of the release notes, as well as:
r? @Mark-Simulacrum