Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unaligned_references: align(N) fields in packed(N) structs are fine #83605

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 29, 2021

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

This removes some false positives from the unaligned_references lint: in a repr(packed(2)) struct, fields of alignment 2 (and less) are guaranteed to be properly aligned, so we do not have to consider them "disaligned".

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 28, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r=me with the failing test updated.

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2021
@RalfJung RalfJung added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 28, 2021
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2021

📌 Commit 1ab05c1 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 28, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 1ab05c1 with merge cc41030...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing cc41030 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 29, 2021
@bors bors merged commit cc41030 into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Mar 29, 2021
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the unaligned branch April 6, 2021 09:02
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2022
fix is_disaligned logic for nested packed structs

rust-lang#83605 broke the `is_disaligned` logic by bailing out of the loop in `is_within_packed` early. This PR fixes that problem and adds suitable tests.

Fixes rust-lang#99838
RalfJung pushed a commit to RalfJung/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
fix is_disaligned logic for nested packed structs

rust-lang/rust#83605 broke the `is_disaligned` logic by bailing out of the loop in `is_within_packed` early. This PR fixes that problem and adds suitable tests.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#99838
RalfJung pushed a commit to RalfJung/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2024
fix is_disaligned logic for nested packed structs

rust-lang/rust#83605 broke the `is_disaligned` logic by bailing out of the loop in `is_within_packed` early. This PR fixes that problem and adds suitable tests.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#99838
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants