-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bootstrap: don't complain about linkcheck if it is excluded #83683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 30, 2021
tblah
force-pushed
the
riscv64linux_links
branch
from
March 30, 2021 17:45
327ac3d
to
de43c40
Compare
We don't need to complain to the user about linkcheck having different hosts and targets when it is already excluded. This can be achieved by moving the check to when the step is run instead of in should_run.
tblah
force-pushed
the
riscv64linux_links
branch
from
March 30, 2021 17:48
de43c40
to
8f97b94
Compare
The second push cleans up the diff - I was too hasty. |
Thanks for the quick fix! @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 8f97b94 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 30, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2021
…mulacrum bootstrap: don't complain about linkcheck if it is excluded We don't need to complain to the user about linkcheck having different hosts and targets when it is already excluded. Resolves rust-lang#83661
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2021
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80720 (Make documentation of which items the prelude exports more readable.) - rust-lang#83654 (Do not emit a suggestion that causes the E0632 error) - rust-lang#83671 (Add a regression test for issue-75801) - rust-lang#83678 (Fix Self keyword doc URL conflict on case insensitive file systems (until definitely fixed on rustdoc)) - rust-lang#83680 (Update for loop desugaring docs) - rust-lang#83683 (bootstrap: don't complain about linkcheck if it is excluded) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We don't need to complain to the user about linkcheck having different
hosts and targets when it is already excluded.
Resolves #83661