Skip to content

rustdoc: Fix typos in maybe_inline_local fn #84574

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2021
Merged

rustdoc: Fix typos in maybe_inline_local fn #84574

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/librustdoc/visit_ast.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> RustdocVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
om
}

/// Tries to resolve the target of a `crate use` statement and inlines the
/// Tries to resolve the target of a `pub use` statement and inlines the
/// target if it is defined locally and would not be documented otherwise,
/// or when it is specifically requested with `please_inline`.
/// (the latter is the case when the import is marked `doc(inline)`)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> RustdocVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|| use_attrs.lists(sym::doc).has_word(sym::hidden);

// For cross-crate impl inlining we need to know whether items are
// reachable in documentation -- a previously nonreachable item can be
// reachable in documentation -- a previously unreachable item can be
// made reachable by cross-crate inlining which we're checking here.
// (this is done here because we need to know this upfront).
if !res_did.is_local() && !is_no_inline {
Expand Down