Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose Concurrent (private type in public i'face) #85287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2021

Conversation

eggyal
Copy link
Contributor

@eggyal eggyal commented May 14, 2021

#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon library/test by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable). However, any that wish to call test::run_test cannot currently do so because test::options::Concurrent (the type of its concurrent parameter) is not publicly exposed.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 14, 2021
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented May 19, 2021

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 19, 2021

📌 Commit 67e8f12 has been approved by m-ou-se

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 19, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 19, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
…ou-se

Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face)

rust-lang#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon `library/test` by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable).  However, any that wish to call `test::run_test` cannot currently do so because `test::options::Concurrent` (the type of its `concurrent` parameter) is not publicly exposed.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
…ou-se

Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face)

rust-lang#53410 introduced experimental support for custom test frameworks.

Such frameworks may wish to build upon `library/test` by calling into its publicly exposed API (which I entirely understand is wholly unstable).  However, any that wish to call `test::run_test` cannot currently do so because `test::options::Concurrent` (the type of its `concurrent` parameter) is not publicly exposed.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84717 (impl FromStr for proc_macro::Literal)
 - rust-lang#85169 (Add method-toggle to <details> for methods)
 - rust-lang#85287 (Expose `Concurrent` (private type in public i'face))
 - rust-lang#85315 (adding time complexity for partition_in_place iter method)
 - rust-lang#85439 (Add diagnostic item to `CStr`)
 - rust-lang#85464 (Fix UB in documented example for `ptr::swap`)
 - rust-lang#85470 (Fix invalid CSS rules for a:hover)
 - rust-lang#85472 (CTFE Machine: do not expose Allocation)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a552b5b into rust-lang:master May 20, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 20, 2021
@eggyal eggyal deleted the expose-test-concurrent branch June 28, 2022 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants