- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Fix a bug in the linkchecker #86156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            Fix a bug in the linkchecker #86156
Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    These were changed in rust-lang#84703.
| (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) | 
      
        
              This comment has been minimized.
        
        
      
    
  This comment has been minimized.
| @bors r+ rollup | 
| 📌 Commit 1e9f0b3 has been approved by  | 
    
  JohnTitor 
      added a commit
        to JohnTitor/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 21, 2021 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…ulacrum Fix a bug in the linkchecker There was a small typo in the linkchecker (in rust-lang#85652) that caused it to report a `#` fragment link error pointing to the wrong file (it was displaying the path to the source file, not the target of the link). This also includes a few other changes: - Fixes the tests due to some changes in the redirect handling in rust-lang#84703. - Adds the tests to rustbuild to run whenever the linkchecker itself is run. - Updates the tests to validate more of the output (so that a mistake like this would have been caught). Closes rust-lang#86144
  This was referenced Jun 21, 2021 
      
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 21, 2021 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#83739 (Account for bad placeholder errors on consts/statics with trait objects) - rust-lang#85637 (document PartialEq, PartialOrd, Ord requirements more explicitly) - rust-lang#86152 (Lazify is_really_default condition in the RustdocGUI bootstrap step) - rust-lang#86156 (Fix a bug in the linkchecker) - rust-lang#86427 (Updated release note) - rust-lang#86452 (fix panic-safety in specialized Zip::next_back) - rust-lang#86484 (Do not set depth to 0 in fully_expand_fragment) - rust-lang#86491 (expand: Move some more derive logic to rustc_builtin_macros) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  github-actions bot
      pushed a commit
        to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Mar 11, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#83739 (Account for bad placeholder errors on consts/statics with trait objects) - rust-lang#85637 (document PartialEq, PartialOrd, Ord requirements more explicitly) - rust-lang#86152 (Lazify is_really_default condition in the RustdocGUI bootstrap step) - rust-lang#86156 (Fix a bug in the linkchecker) - rust-lang#86427 (Updated release note) - rust-lang#86452 (fix panic-safety in specialized Zip::next_back) - rust-lang#86484 (Do not set depth to 0 in fully_expand_fragment) - rust-lang#86491 (expand: Move some more derive logic to rustc_builtin_macros) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a small typo in the linkchecker (in #85652) that caused it to report a
#fragment link error pointing to the wrong file (it was displaying the path to the source file, not the target of the link).This also includes a few other changes:
Closes #86144